Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Products of near-one characteristic factors

Statement

Let each row (zn,k)1≤k≤kn be a finite family of complex numbers; empty rows are allowed with maximum zero. Suppose max⁡k∣zn,k−1∣→0, M:=sup⁡n∑k∣zn,k−1∣<∞, and ∑k∣zn,k−1∣2→0. Then ∏kzn,k−exp⁡ ⁣(∑k(zn,k−1))⟶0.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

The exponential is its power series. The complex exponential by its power series.

[F2]

The series converges absolutely at every complex argument. The complex exponential series converges absolutely for every complex argument.

[F3]

Proof

Given: Let each row (zn,k)1≤k≤kn be a finite family of complex numbers; empty rows are allowed with maximum zero. Suppose max⁡k∣zn,k−1∣→0, M:=sup⁡n∑k∣zn,k−1∣<∞, and ∑k∣zn,k−1∣2→0. Then ∏kzn,k−exp⁡ ⁣(∑k(zn,k−1))⟶0.

1.1F1F2F3

Put wn,k=zn,k−1. For ∣w∣≤1/2, absolute convergence gives ∣ew−1−w∣≤∑j≥2∣w∣j/j!≤∣w∣2∑j≥2(1/2)j−2/2=∣w∣2. Also ∣1+w∣≤1+∣w∣≤e∣w∣ and ∣ew∣≤∑j≥0∣w∣j/j!=e∣w∣. The real series is nonnegative term by term, which proves the middle inequality without a logarithm.

2.1step 1.1algebra

For arbitrary finite lists a,b of length r, subtracting successive mixed products gives ∏k=1rak−∏k=1rbk=∑j=1r(aj−bj)(∏k<jak)(∏k>jbk). The cancellation follows by expanding each difference; for r=0 both products are one and the sum zero. Apply it with ak=1+wn,k and bk=ewn,k. For all sufficiently large n every modulus of w is at most 1/2. Each pair of partial products is bounded by exp⁡(∑k≠j∣wn,k∣)≤eM, so the difference of the row products has modulus at most eM∑j∣wn,j∣2.

3.1step 2.1F3∎

The bound tends to zero by hypothesis. Repeated exponential addition identifies the comparison product with exp⁡(∑kwn,k), including empty and one-factor rows. If M=0 then all w vanish and equality is exact in every row. All products and telescoping sums are finite; no branch of logarithm or choice principle is used.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources