Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Lindeberg-Feller central limit theorem: sufficiency

Statement

Assume AC. If a centered row-wise independent triangular array has finite second moments, sn>0 and the Lindeberg condition, then sn1k=1knXn,kN(0,1).

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Normalization makes total variance one and preserves the Lindeberg quantity. Total row variance and the Lindeberg condition.

[F2]

The scalar remainder obeys min(|u|^3/3,4u^2), and the centered exponential increment is bounded by u^2. Second-order characteristic-function expansion.

[F3]

Lindeberg implies maximal entry variance tends to zero. The Lindeberg condition implies Feller negligibility.

[F4]

The near-one product estimate controls the full growing row. Products of near-one characteristic factors.

[F5]

Finite row independence identifies the product transform. Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums.

[F6]

The standard-normal transform is exp(-t^2/2). Characteristic function of a normal law.

[F7]

Under AC pointwise convergence to a specified characteristic function implies weak convergence. Characteristic function criterion for weak convergence.

[F8]

Finite sums and centered integrable terms may be integrated linearly. The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ).

[F9]

The modulus of a complex integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus. The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus.

Proof

Given: Assume AC. If a centered row-wise independent triangular array has finite second moments, sn>0 and the Lindeberg condition, then sn1k=1knXn,kN(0,1).

1.1

Put Yn,k=Xn,k/sn and vn,k=EYn,k2. By [F1], the normalized row has total variance one, remains centered and independent, and its tail sum Ln(ε) tends to zero. Fix real t and write wn,k=φYn,k(t)1. The centering and scalar bound in [F2] give wn,k=E(eitYn,k1itYn,k)t2vn,k, using [F8]–[F9]. Consequently kwn,kt2, maxkwn,kt2maxkvn,k0, and kwn,k2t4maxkvn,k0 by [F3].

F1F2F3F8F9
2.1

With r as in [F2], linearity gives kwn,k=t2/2+kEr(tYn,k). On Yn,kε the cubic bound gives r(tYn,k)t3εYn,k2/3; on the complement the quadratic bound gives r(tYn,k)4t2Yn,k2. Therefore kEr(tYn,k)t3ε/3+4t2Ln(ε). First take limsup in n, then let the arbitrary positive epsilon decrease to zero. This proves kwn,kt2/2, without interchanging an unbounded number of unquantified little-o terms.

step 1.1F2F8F9
3.1

All hypotheses of [F4] were verified in step 1.1, so k(1+wn,k)exp(kwn,k)0. Step 2.1 makes its limit et2/2. By [F5] this product is the row-sum transform, and by [F6] its limit is the transform of N(0,1), continuous at zero. [F7] proves the result. At t=0 all factors and the limit are exactly one. AC is inherited in [F6]–[F7]; rows on different probability spaces cause no difficulty because only their laws are compared.

step 1.1step 2.1F4F5F6F7

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources