How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Lindeberg-Feller central limit theorem: sufficiency
Statement
Assume AC. If a centered row-wise independent triangular array has finite second moments, and the Lindeberg condition, then
Facts & Assumptions
Normalization makes total variance one and preserves the Lindeberg quantity. Total row variance and the Lindeberg condition.
The scalar remainder obeys min(|u|^3/3,4u^2), and the centered exponential increment is bounded by u^2. Second-order characteristic-function expansion.
Lindeberg implies maximal entry variance tends to zero. The Lindeberg condition implies Feller negligibility.
The near-one product estimate controls the full growing row. Products of near-one characteristic factors.
Finite row independence identifies the product transform. Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums.
The standard-normal transform is exp(-t^2/2). Characteristic function of a normal law.
Under AC pointwise convergence to a specified characteristic function implies weak convergence. Characteristic function criterion for weak convergence.
Finite sums and centered integrable terms may be integrated linearly. The Lebesgue integral is linear on .
The modulus of a complex integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus. The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus.
Proof
Given: Assume AC. If a centered row-wise independent triangular array has finite second moments, and the Lindeberg condition, then
Put and . By [F1], the normalized row has total variance one, remains centered and independent, and its tail sum tends to zero. Fix real t and write . The centering and scalar bound in [F2] give , using [F8]–[F9]. Consequently , , and by [F3].
With r as in [F2], linearity gives . On the cubic bound gives ; on the complement the quadratic bound gives . Therefore . First take limsup in n, then let the arbitrary positive epsilon decrease to zero. This proves , without interchanging an unbounded number of unquantified little-o terms.
All hypotheses of [F4] were verified in step 1.1, so . Step 2.1 makes its limit . By [F5] this product is the row-sum transform, and by [F6] its limit is the transform of N(0,1), continuous at zero. [F7] proves the result. At t=0 all factors and the limit are exactly one. AC is inherited in [F6]–[F7]; rows on different probability spaces cause no difficulty because only their laws are compared.
Depends on
- Total row variance and the Lindeberg condition
- Second-order characteristic-function expansion
- The Lindeberg condition implies Feller negligibility
- Products of near-one characteristic factors
- Characteristic functions under affine maps and independent sums
- Characteristic function of a normal law
- Characteristic function criterion for weak convergence
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- The modulus of an integral is bounded by the integral of the modulus
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
46 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, Theorem 3.4.10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Billingsley, Probability and Measure, Theorem 27.2 (standard reference, not scraped)