Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Derived coherent duality on projective space

Statement

Assume AC. Let P=PkN and ωP=OP(−N−1), with Laurent residue trace tP:HN(P,ωP)→k. For all K∈DCohb(P) evaluation followed by this trace gives a natural quasi-isomorphism RΓ(P,R ⁣HomP(K,ωP[N]))⟶RHom⁡k(RΓ(P,K),k). In particular it holds in every degree, with the usual signs for shifts and distinguished triangles.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: P,N,k,K and AC.

[F2]

Coherent sheaves on P have finite twisted locally free resolutions (Finite twisted locally free resolutions on projective space).

[F3]

Derived evaluation products are the cup and Yoneda products (Cup product in sheaf cohomology, Yoneda product is composition in the derived category); a distinguished triangle gives long exact Hom sequences (Long exact Hom sequences of a distinguished triangle), compared by the five lemma (Five lemma for a morphism of long exact sequences).

Proof

1.1F1F2F3construct

By the cohomology calculation [F1], RΓ(P,ωP[N]) has k as its sole cohomology, in degree zero; the Laurent trace identifies it with k. Every coherent complex on P is perfect: [F2] gives this for a sheaf, and finite truncation triangles give it for bounded coherent cohomology. Thus derived internal Hom and evaluation are computed locally by bounded finite locally free complexes. Compose the derived cup map and evaluation with the trace to obtain RΓ(R ⁣Hom(K,ωP[N]))⊗kLRΓ(K)→k. The tensor-Hom adjoint is the map in the statement. It is natural and respects triangles because it is induced by chain evaluation and the signed total-complex differential.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1algebra∎

For K=OP(m), the map on degree a cohomology is precisely HN+a(P,O(−m−N−1))→H−a(P,O(m))∨, which is an isomorphism in all degrees by [F1], including the zero groups outside their ranges. Hence the map is a quasi-isomorphism for twists and their finite direct sums and shifts. Both functors in the assertion take triangles to triangles contravariantly; exact duality of vector spaces makes the right-hand cohomology equal to the dual of the opposite-degree cohomology. The long exact sequences of [F3] and the five lemma [F3] extend the isomorphism across a cone. Apply this finitely many times to a resolution in [F2], then to truncation triangles of a bounded coherent complex. This proves the assertion for every K and supplies compatibility with connecting maps. AC enters through [F2] and the derived-category and product suppliers.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources