How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Serre duality for coherent sheaves on a projective Cohen–Macaulay scheme
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a field and let be a projective, pure -dimensional Cohen–Macaulay -scheme. Let be its normalized dualizing complex, and let be its trace. For every coherent sheaf and every integer , composition followed by trace gives a natural perfect pairing of finite-dimensional vector spaces Here Ext is global Ext; negative Ext and negative sheaf cohomology are zero. Equivalently, For the complex form — an isomorphism in — is . Coherent derived biduality holds with respect to , even when is not locally free or perfect on .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and AC.
The normalized embedding duality, including its evaluation pairing, is Normalized trace and independence of a projective embedding; its coherent biduality comes from the embedding construction Existence and biduality from a projective embedding. The underlying global derived comparison is the closed-immersion adjunction Derived adjunction for finite rings and closed immersions composed with the projective-space evaluation/trace isomorphism Derived coherent duality on projective space.
CM concentration is Concentration of the projective dualizing complex on a pure CM scheme.
Ext from the structure sheaf equals cohomology, and Yoneda product is derived composition (Injective modules are flasque and Ext from the structure sheaf is cohomology, Yoneda product is composition in the derived category).
Coherent cohomology on a closed subscheme of projective space is finite (Projective coherent finiteness and large twist vanishing); on a Noetherian scheme of dimension , quasi-coherent cohomology vanishes above (Dimension bound for quasi-coherent cohomology on a Noetherian scheme).
Proof
Apply [F1] to with . Since by [F2], its left side becomes ; its right side is . For , [F3] represents it by . A class pairs with it by . This is the Yoneda composition of [F3] and is exactly the evaluation comparison proved in [F1]. Thus it is bilinear, natural in , and compatible with shifts and connecting maps.
Apply [F4] to the closed subscheme supplied by a projective embedding: its finite-dimensionality clause gives that each is a finite-dimensional -vector space. The isomorphism in step 1.1 proves that the adjoint map from Ext to the dual of cohomology is an isomorphism. For a finite-dimensional space, evaluation into its double dual is an isomorphism, so the other adjoint map is an isomorphism as well. Outside , cohomology vanishes by [F4] and the negative-degree convention; step 1.1 then proves the corresponding Ext vanishing. For bounded coherent , retain the actual global derived comparison used in [F1]: closed-immersion adjunction gives , and the projective-space evaluation/trace map identifies the latter with . This comparison is an isomorphism in induced by the same counit and trace, so its naturality and signs are those of [F1]. The biduality is the coherent biduality of the embedding construction [F1], valid after pushing into the ambient projective space, without imposing perfectness on over the singular scheme. AC enters through the cited resolution, derived-composition and cohomology suppliers.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Dualizing complexes and the normalized dualizing sheaf on a projective CM scheme
- Existence and biduality from a projective embedding
- Normalized trace and independence of a projective embedding
- Concentration of the projective dualizing complex on a pure CM scheme
- Yoneda product is composition in the derived category
- Injective modules are flasque and Ext from the structure sheaf is cohomology
- Projective coherent finiteness and large twist vanishing
- Dimension bound for quasi-coherent cohomology on a Noetherian scheme
- Derived adjunction for finite rings and closed immersions
- Derived coherent duality on projective space
Used by
- The affine line disproves the proper duality formula without properness Counterexample
- Coherent duality on a singular plane cubic Example
- Surface duality for twists and a skyscraper on the projective plane Example
- Curve duality and its residue normalization in dimension one Remark
- The smooth projective locally free theorem is the special case Remark
Dependency tree · two levels
79 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stacks, Lemma 48.27.5(3)–(4): exact derived and coherent Ext assertions (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks, Remark 48.27.2: trace pairing (standard reference, not scraped)
- Vakil 2025, Corollary 29.3.14: coherent Ext duality; Remark 29.3.15: trace outline completed here (standard reference, not scraped)