Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Szegedy reflections and walk operators are unitary

Statement

For the projection Π=TT∗ onto A=ran⁡(T), the operators RA=2Π−I and S are self-adjoint involutions. Hence U=SRA and W=U2 are unitary. On A⊥, Π=0 and therefore U=−S.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The finite row-preparation isometry T, its adjoint, the swap S, and the definitions of Π,RA,U,W in Szegedy row-preparation map and discriminant and Szegedy reflection walk and its two-reflection square.

[F1]

The Szegedy discriminant is self-adjoint and contractive: T∗T=I, so T is an isometry.

[F2]

Szegedy reflection walk and its two-reflection square: Π=TT∗, RA=2Π−I, and U=SRA.

[F3]

An endomorphism is an orthogonal projection exactly when it is idempotent and self-adjoint: a self-adjoint idempotent is the orthogonal projection onto its image.

[F4]

Linear isometries, and orthogonal or unitary operators on finite-dimensional inner product spaces: a unitary operator is an invertible linear isometry on a finite-dimensional complex inner-product space.

[F5]

Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument: the inner product is positive definite and uses the root's linear-first convention.

[F7]

Szegedy row-preparation map and discriminant: S∣x,y⟩=∣y,x⟩ on the orthonormal product basis.

Proof

1.1F1F2F3F6algebra

From [F1], Π2=TT∗TT∗=T(T∗T)T∗=TT∗=Π. For all u,v, [F6] and conjugate symmetry give ⟨Πu,v⟩=⟨T∗u,T∗v⟩=⟨u,Πv⟩, so Π∗=Π. By [F3], Π is the orthogonal projection onto its image, which is A=ran⁡(T) because it fixes every Tv.

2.1F2F4F5F7step 1.1algebra

Since Π2=Π and Π∗=Π, RA∗=2Π∗−I=RA and RA2=4Π2−4Π+I=I. Thus ∥RAw∥2=⟨RAw,RAw⟩=⟨w,RA∗RAw⟩=∥w∥2 for every w. By [F7], S permutes the orthonormal product basis by the transposition (x,y)↦(y,x), so its permutation matrix is its own inverse and adjoint: S2=I and S∗=S. It is therefore an invertible isometry and is unitary.

3.1F1F2F4F5F6F7step 2.1algebra∎

If w∈A⊥, then [F6] gives ⟨v,T∗w⟩=⟨Tv,w⟩=0 for every v, so taking v=T∗w and using positive definiteness [F5] gives T∗w=0 and Πw=0; hence Uw=S(2Π−I)w=−Sw. Both S and RA are invertible norm-preserving maps by step 2.1, so U=SRA and W=U2 are unitary.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Szegedy reflection walk and its two-reflection square.

Dependency tree · two levels

34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources