How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Clifford circuits lift binary symplectic transvections
Statement
For every nonzero , the transvection is induced on binary Pauli labels by an explicit Clifford circuit made from local , , , CNOT, and wire swaps. Its mod- phase lift is computed by applying the exact gate update rules in sequence; no phase coordinate is suppressed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , a nonzero label , the ordered phase-aware Pauli convention, and a gate word whose binary action is the composition of the gate-label updates.
Hadamard pauli action: swaps and changes to modulo .
Phase gate pauli action: sends to ; solving these equations for the input shows sends to .
CNOT Pauli action: CNOT sends to , to , and leaves the other bits and unchanged.
Hermitian Pauli phase criterion: if represents , then is Hermitian and has label .
Ordered tensor registers, their inner product, and wire permutations: a wire swap permutes the ordered product-basis factors, so its conjugation permutes the corresponding coordinates and leaves the phase unchanged.
Binary symplectic form: over .
Clifford normalizer: is the unitary normalizer of and is closed under products and adjoints.
Proof
Each listed gate and its inverse normalizes by its exact Pauli action. On binary labels, preserves because swapping in both arguments leaves unchanged by [F6]. For , the local pairing becomes , equal to the old value in ; its inverse has the same label action. For CNOT , write and , with the -part of . The affected contribution after the updates in [F3] is . The added terms and each occur twice and cancel, leaving the original pairing. By [F5], wire swaps permute the paired coordinate summands and preserve the form. Hadamard and swap are involutions, CNOT is self-inverse, and is the inverse of ; hence each binary gate map is invertible. Thus every finite gate word has an invertible symplectic map , and its unitary lies in by [F7].
Let be the representative of , so is Hermitian by [F4]. Choose a wire on which is nonzero and swap it to wire . On each supported wire, the local factor is proportional to , , or . Apply no gate to an factor, to a factor, and to a factor; [F1] and [F2] send each local binary label to , while their phase updates compute the accumulated scalar exactly modulo . The resulting binary label is the nonempty product of on the support of .
For each other supported wire , apply CNOT . By [F3], it sends to , so the finite list removes all labels while retaining ; then apply to change to . This constructs a circuit with : conjugation preserves Hermiticity, so the phase of an image with label is or modulo . For , the induced symplectic map sends the label of to .
The binary action of is by [F2], since [F6] gives . Therefore acts by : for any , symplecticity of gives . The circuit lies in by step 1.1.
Each gate formula in [F1]–[F3] gives the exact image phase in as well as the binary label; [F5] gives the exact no-change phase for swaps. Induction on the finite gate list for therefore computes each generator-image phase by repeated application of those formulas, without replacing it by its binary parity.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
34 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Scott Aaronson and Daniel Gottesman, Improved Simulation of Stabilizer Circuits (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes (standard reference, not scraped)
- John Watrous, Understanding Quantum Information and Computation, Lesson 14 (standard reference, not scraped)