How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A rational isotropic subspace saturates to an integral direct summand
Statement
Let be a free abelian group of rank and let be a bilinear form. Write and extend -bilinearly to . If is a -subspace of dimension and for all , then is a rank- direct summand of and .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-rank free abelian group , an integral bilinear form , and a -dimensional rational isotropic subspace , where .
The displayed hypotheses are the complete input; no choice axiom is used.
Proof
Choose a -basis of . Clearing the finitely many denominators in the coordinates of each gives nonzero integer multiples . The remain -linearly independent, so has rank at least ; it has rank at most . Hence .
If , , and , then and therefore because is a -subspace. Thus , so is saturated in .
We prove by induction on that every saturated subgroup is a direct summand. The cases and are immediate. Otherwise choose a nonzero , divide its coordinates by their greatest common divisor, and use saturation to see that the resulting primitive vector still lies in . The Euclidean algorithm gives a unimodular change of basis carrying to the first standard basis vector, so write . Every has a unique form with , and . Therefore . The subgroup is saturated in ; its rank is , since the projection of to is onto. Induction makes a direct summand of , hence a direct summand of .
Apply step 3.1 to the saturated rank- subgroup from step 2.1. It is a direct summand of .
Since and vanishes on , its restriction to vanishes. Together with rank and the direct-summand conclusion of step 4.1, this proves the claim.
Used by
Dependency tree · 0 levels
Nothing. This result depends on no other item in the library.
Sources
- Charles Livingston, A Survey of Classical Knot Concordance (standard reference, not scraped)
- Charles Livingston and Allison N. Miller, The concordance genus of knots, II (standard reference, not scraped)