Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A real nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function is nonzero at one

Statement

If χ is a real nonprincipal Dirichlet character, then L(1,χ)≠0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real nonprincipal Dirichlet character χ modulo q.

[L1]

On Re⁡s>1, the principal factor is L(s,χ0)=ζ(s)∏p∣q(1−p−s); ζ continues meromorphically to Re⁡s>0 with its only pole there simple at 1 (The principal Dirichlet L-function factors through zeta, For Re⁡s>0, zeta admits the fractional-part integral formula with a simple residue-one pole at 1).

[L2]

On unit classes, a real Dirichlet character takes values in {±1}, and on nonunits it is 0 (Character values on units are roots of unity).

[L3]

Every Dirichlet L-function has its Euler product on Re⁡s>1 (Euler product for Dirichlet L-functions).

[L4]

The nonprincipal factor L(s,χ) is holomorphic on Re⁡s>0 (Nonprincipal Dirichlet L-functions are holomorphic on Re s greater than 0).

[L5]

A Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients and finite abscissa of convergence is singular at its abscissa of convergence (Landau's theorem for Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1L2L3givenassume-contraalgebra

Suppose L(1,χ)=0, and set G(s):=L(s,χ0)L(s,χ). For Re⁡s>1, facts [L2] and [L3] give G(s)=∏χ(p)=1(1−p−s)−2∏χ(p)=−1(1−p−2s)−1, because primes dividing q contribute the trivial local factor 1. Expanding the geometric series shows that G(s)=∑n≥1ann−s with nonnegative integer coefficients an. Moreover, if (m,q)=1, then the square coefficient am2≥1: each local factor above has a positive integer coefficient at every even exponent occurring in m2.

2.1L1L4L5step 1.1discharge-contradiction∎

Step 1.1 implies ∑n≥1ann−1/2≥∑m≥1(m,q)=1am2m≥∑m≥1(m,q)=11m=∞, so the abscissa of convergence σc of ∑ann−s satisfies σc≥1/2. On the other hand, the product identity in [L1] continues L(s,χ0) to Re⁡s>0; [L1] and [L4] show that G is holomorphic there, because the only possible singularity is the simple pole of L(s,χ0) at 1, canceled by the assumption of step 1.1. Since G is represented by a Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients, [L5] forbids any positive abscissa of convergence. Thus σc≤0, contradicting σc≥1/2. Therefore L(1,χ)≠0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources