How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A real nonprincipal Dirichlet L-function is nonzero at one
Statement
If is a real nonprincipal Dirichlet character, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real nonprincipal Dirichlet character modulo .
On , the principal factor is ; continues meromorphically to with its only pole there simple at (The principal Dirichlet L-function factors through zeta, For , zeta admits the fractional-part integral formula with a simple residue-one pole at ).
On unit classes, a real Dirichlet character takes values in , and on nonunits it is (Character values on units are roots of unity).
Every Dirichlet -function has its Euler product on (Euler product for Dirichlet L-functions).
The nonprincipal factor is holomorphic on (Nonprincipal Dirichlet L-functions are holomorphic on Re s greater than 0).
A Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients and finite abscissa of convergence is singular at its abscissa of convergence (Landau's theorem for Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients).
Proof
Suppose , and set . For , facts [L2] and [L3] give because primes dividing contribute the trivial local factor . Expanding the geometric series shows that with nonnegative integer coefficients . Moreover, if , then the square coefficient : each local factor above has a positive integer coefficient at every even exponent occurring in .
Step 1.1 implies so the abscissa of convergence of satisfies . On the other hand, the product identity in [L1] continues to ; [L1] and [L4] show that is holomorphic there, because the only possible singularity is the simple pole of at , canceled by the assumption of step 1.1. Since is represented by a Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients, [L5] forbids any positive abscissa of convergence. Thus , contradicting . Therefore .
Depends on
- Character values on units are roots of unity
- Euler product for Dirichlet L-functions
- The principal Dirichlet L-function factors through zeta
- Nonprincipal Dirichlet L-functions are holomorphic on Re s greater than 0
- For $\operatorname{Re}s>0$, zeta admits the fractional-part integral formula with a simple residue-one pole at $1$
- Landau's theorem for Dirichlet series with nonnegative coefficients
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
19 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Kiran S. Kedlaya, Notes on Analytic Number Theory, Theorem 3.11 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Leonard Tomczak, Analytic Number Theory, Chapter 4 (standard reference, not scraped)