How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An explicit root-separation bound for squarefree integer polynomials
Statement
Let be primitive and squarefree, with , , and coefficient height . Put and
Every complex root of satisfies , and any two distinct complex roots satisfy . For , has at most one root, so no pairwise separation bound is needed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A primitive squarefree integer polynomial of degree , leading coefficient , height , and its complex roots counted once.
Every nonconstant complex polynomial has a complex root and factors into linear factors by repeated division (Fundamental theorem of algebra by Liouville's theorem).
The formal derivative obeys the product rule (Linearity, power rule, Leibniz rule and the degree bound for the formal derivative).
The determinant is the signed finite sum of products of matrix entries (For , the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and for a real matrix).
Determinants multiply, are invariant under similarity, and a triangular determinant is the product of its diagonal entries (For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, , Similar matrices over a commutative ring have the same determinant, The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries).
Complex modulus is multiplicative and satisfies the triangle inequality (Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, , and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive).
Polynomial division over a field gives a quotient and lower-degree remainder (Division algorithm for polynomials over a field).
A polynomial vanishing at is divisible by (Factor theorem over a commutative ring).
The rationals and complex numbers are fields, and the rationals have characteristic zero (The rationals form a totally ordered field, is a field, every element is uniquely , and every nonzero element has inverse ).
Degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials over a field (Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials).
Proof
If and , then , because and . This contradiction proves for every root.
Let be the distinct roots from [F1] and set . Form the coefficient map from pairs with , to polynomials of degree at most . Its square coefficient matrix has integer entries, so is an integer-coefficient polynomial in .
Divide each output polynomial by and record its quotient and remainder. In coefficient order from highest degree down, the map has triangular diagonal consisting of copies of and copies of , so the inverse coordinate change has determinant . Under this change, has block form , where is multiplication by on . Hence .
For each define . These degree- polynomials satisfy when and otherwise. For every degree- representative , the difference has degree and vanishes at all distinct roots; [F7] and [F9] force this difference to be zero. Thus evaluation is an isomorphism . It conjugates to the diagonal matrix with entries , so [F4] gives . By [F2], ; pairing the two factors for each yields .
Set the variable to zero in the integer-coefficient polynomial . Then and , so every has degree at most ; the coefficient map misses the coordinate and its determinant is zero. Therefore the constant term in of is zero, so divides as an integer-coefficient polynomial. At the given integer coefficients, is an integer, and [step 3.1] shows that is an integer up to sign.
Squarefreeness makes every root distinct, so every factor in is nonzero and .
Let and choose a pair attaining it. Every other pairwise distance is at most by [step 1.1] and the triangle inequality [F5]. Thus . Rearranging gives .
Depends on
- Exact gcd squarefree decomposition preserves roots and multiplicities
- The polynomial ring over a commutative ring as finitely supported coefficient sequences with convolution
- The formal derivative of a polynomial
- For $n\ge1$, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and $|\det A|$ for a real matrix
- Division algorithm for polynomials over a field
- Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials
- Fundamental theorem of algebra by Liouville's theorem
- Conjugation is an involutive real-field automorphism, $z\overline z=|z|^2$, and modulus is definite, multiplicative, and subadditive
- The rationals form a totally ordered field
- Linearity, power rule, Leibniz rule and the degree bound for the formal derivative
- Factor theorem over a commutative ring
- For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, $\det(AB)=\det(A)\det(B)$
- The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries
- Similar matrices over a commutative ring have the same determinant
- $\mathbb C=\mathbb R[x]/(x^2+1)$ is a field, every element is uniquely $a+bi$, and every nonzero element has inverse $(a-bi)/(a^2+b^2)$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
61 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Marc Moreno Maza, Tutorial on real root isolation of polynomial systems, Root estimation I–II (standard reference, not scraped)
- Colm Ó Dúnlaing, Mathematics 1263: Introduction to Numerical Analysis, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)