How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Strong-mixing covariance bound in terms of tail quantiles
Statement
Let be sub-sigma-algebras of a probability space and put For any real random variable , define its absolute tail quantile by This is a nonnegative nonincreasing Borel function and, for every nonnegative Borel function , If are square-integrable real random variables measurable respectively with respect to , then In particular, if and almost surely, the right-hand side is at most . For complex with these bounds and the same measurability, For two collections of observations separated by time steps in a process , the coefficient of their sigma-algebras is at most as defined in Strong, uniform, and maximal-correlation mixing coefficients. An integral whose upper endpoint is zero is zero.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The sigma-algebras, quantiles, moment and measurability hypotheses in the Statement.
The strong-mixing coefficient is the supremum of the event-probability differences for the specified separated sigma-algebras. (Strong, uniform, and maximal-correlation mixing coefficients)
Covariance is for square-integrable real variables. (Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space)
Cauchy–Schwarz bounds the expectation of the absolute product of two square-integrable real variables. (Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables)
A nonnegative random variable is the integral of its threshold indicators, and its expectation is its integrated tail probability. (Layer-cake formulas for random variables)
Nonnegative product-measurable functions on sigma-finite product spaces admit either order of integration. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product)
Finite measures agreeing on a generating pi-system and on the whole space are equal. (Finite measures agreeing on a generating pi-system and on the whole space are equal)
Proof
For a finite real , write for . The tail tends to zero at infinity, is nonincreasing and is right-continuous. Thus is finite for , is nonincreasing, and is Borel measurable. More precisely, if and only if : if , then belongs to the set defining the infimum; if , right-continuity supplies an with , so that infimum exceeds . Consequently Lebesgue measure on gives for every . The laws of under and of therefore agree on all closed left rays and both have total mass one. These rays form a pi-system and generate the Borel sigma-algebra: their differences give half-open intervals, and countable unions of those give all open intervals. By [F6] the laws agree, proving the stated integral identity. In particular .
Suppose first and . Their first moments and are finite by [F3]. The threshold-indicator identities and [F5] give and . Both integrands have finite integrals, so their difference represents the covariance and the integral triangle inequality applies. The absolute threshold-indicator covariance is bounded by , by , and by , since the joint probability and the product probability both lie between zero and either marginal probability.
Put and . By [F5] and step 1.1, Indeed the minimum is , and each inner threshold set has length its quantile. The right-hand side is finite by Cauchy–Schwarz on and the squared-quantile identity in step 1.1; this particular integral Cauchy–Schwarz inequality follows by integrating and minimizing the resulting quadratic, with the zero-norm case immediate. Step 1.2 therefore proves the covariance bound with constant one for nonnegative .
For real , expand into four terms. Each nonnegative part has a tail quantile at most the corresponding absolute quantile, because its tail probabilities are smaller. The result of step 2.1 bounds each term by ; the triangle inequality gives the asserted factor four. If and , their absolute quantiles are bounded by , so the bound becomes , including or either zero bound.
For complex , expand into the four real bilinear covariance terms of their real and imaginary parts. Each real part is bounded in absolute value by or , so step 3.1 and the complex triangle inequality give . Finally, for observations separated by , both collection sigma-algebras are sub-sigma-algebras of the past and future fields appearing in [F1]; their event supremum is therefore at most . All assertions follow.
Depends on
- Strong, uniform, and maximal-correlation mixing coefficients
- Moments, variance, and covariance on a probability space
- Cauchy-Schwarz for random variables
- Layer-cake formulas for random variables
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- Finite measures agreeing on a generating pi-system and on the whole space are equal
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- P. Doukhan, P. Massart and E. Rio, The functional central limit theorem for strongly mixing processes, Lemma 1 and Proposition 1 (standard reference, not scraped)