Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-07-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If ι(n+1)an0\iota(n+1)a_n\to0, short multiplicative blocks of the coefficients have uniformly small sums

Statement

Suppose ι(n+1)an0\iota(n+1)a_n\to0. For every ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is N0N_0 such that, whenever qpN0q\ge p\ge N_0,

n=pqanει(qp+1)ι(p+1).\sum_{n=p}^{q}|a_n|\le\varepsilon\frac{\iota(q-p+1)}{\iota(p+1)}.

Moreover, for NN0N\ge N_0 and xN:=11/ι(N+1)x_N:=1-1/\iota(N+1),

n=N0Nan(1xNn)ε,n>NanxNnε.\sum_{n=N_0}^{N}|a_n|(1-x_N^n)\le\varepsilon,\qquad \sum_{n>N}|a_n|x_N^n\le\varepsilon.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Tauber condition ι(n+1)an0\iota(n+1)a_n\to0.

[L1]

The canonical naturals ι(n+1)\iota(n+1) are positive and strictly increasing, positive reciprocals reverse order, and uv=uv|uv|=|u||v| (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Basic properties of the absolute value).

[L2]

Real-sequence convergence is tested with positive rational tolerances, and below every positive real lies a positive rational (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals, The rationals embed densely in the reals).

[L3]

For 0x10\le x\le1, multiplying out the finite sum gives 1xn=(1x)k=0n1xkι(n)(1x)1-x^n=(1-x)\sum_{k=0}^{n-1}x^k\le\iota(n)(1-x).

[L4]

For 0x<10\le x<1, the geometric-series formula gives n>Nxn=xN+1/(1x)\sum_{n>N}x^n=x^{N+1}/(1-x) (For r<1|r| < 1, k0rk=1/(1r)\sum_{k \ge 0} r^k = 1/(1-r), and for r1|r| \ge 1 the series diverges).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose a positive rational δ<ε\delta<\varepsilon. By the limit hypothesis and [L2], choose N0N_0 so that ι(n+1)an<δ|\iota(n+1)a_n|<\delta for nN0n\ge N_0. Positivity and multiplicativity in [L1] give an<δ/ι(n+1)<ε/ι(n+1)|a_n|<\delta/\iota(n+1)<\varepsilon/\iota(n+1) there. Since 1/ι(n+1)1/ι(p+1)1/\iota(n+1)\le1/\iota(p+1) on pnqp\le n\le q, summing proves the block estimate.

L1L2choosealgebra
2.1

For N0nNN_0\le n\le N, [L3] gives an(1xNn)ε(1xN)|a_n|(1-x_N^n)\le\varepsilon(1-x_N). There are at most N+1N+1 terms and ι(N+1)(1xN)=1\iota(N+1)(1-x_N)=1, proving the first weighted estimate.

step 1.1L3algebra
3.1

For n>Nn>N, step 1.1 gives anε/ι(N+2)|a_n|\le\varepsilon/\iota(N+2). Summing the geometric tail yields n>NanxNnεxNN+1ι(N+1)/ι(N+2)ε\sum_{n>N}|a_n|x_N^n\le\varepsilon x_N^{N+1}\iota(N+1)/\iota(N+2)\le\varepsilon.

step 1.1L4algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 78 results over 28 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources