Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Diagram closure trace is cyclic and satisfies the tower rules

Statement

For any commutative ring R, loop value δ∈R, and n≥0, the unnormalized trace of Unnormalized diagram closure and partial trace satisfies

Tr⁡n(xy)=Tr⁡n(yx),Tr⁡n+1(x⊗1)=δTr⁡n(x)

for x,y∈TLn(R,δ). For n≥1 and x∈TLn(R,δ), it also satisfies

Tr⁡n+1((x⊗1)Un)=Tr⁡n(x),

where Un is the cup-cap generator on the last two strands of TLn+1. For n≥1, x∈TLn−1 and h∈TLn,

Tr⁡n(h(x⊗1))=Tr⁡n−1(ptr⁡n(h)x).

No division by δ occurs.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative ring R, δ∈R, the diagram algebras with their stated stacking product, and the closure and partial-trace maps.

[F1]

A basis diagram is a noncrossing matching; stacking glues the intermediate endpoints and assigns one factor δ to each removed closed component (Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules).

[F2]

Stacking is associative and identities act on both sides (Stacking is associative and horizontal juxtaposition is strict monoidal).

[F3]

The closure and partial trace are defined by the stated graph closure and cap/cup composite (Unnormalized diagram closure and partial trace).

Proof

technique · count connected components of finite glued graphs
1.1F1F3construct

For basis diagrams D,E:n→n, closing the stack DE makes a finite graph whose vertices are glued endpoints and whose components are circles. Moving the cut between the D-layer and the E-layer changes the cyclic order in which the same two layers are read but neither the component partition nor the number of circles. Hence the closed graph of DE and that of ED have the same number of circles. Definition [F3] assigns both the same power of δ, so Tr⁡n(DE)=Tr⁡n(ED). Bilinearity extends this equality to arbitrary x,y.

1.2F1F3algebra

In the closure of D⊗11, the extra vertical strand closes to one circle disjoint from every component of the closure of D. Thus the closed graph has exactly c(D)+1 circles; its value is δc(D)+1=δTr⁡n(D), an identity valid also at δ=0.

1.3F1F3F4algebra

Let n≥1. In the closure of (D⊗11)Un, the cap and cup of Un reconnect the added strand to the final old strand. Following the two arcs through the stack shows they form part of the same exterior-to-exterior path that was closed in D; they create no separate circle. Every other component is unchanged. The circle count is therefore c(D), proving Tr⁡n+1((D⊗1)Un)=Tr⁡n(D). Bilinearity gives the result for x.

2.1F1F2F3step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3algebra∎

Let n≥1. By [F3], ptr⁡n(h) is obtained by adding the rightmost cup, stacking h on the enlarged graph, and then joining the rightmost pair by the cap. Closing the remaining n−1 strands produces exactly the same finite graph as closing h(x⊗1) after the same x has been stacked on the first n−1 strands. The two closures therefore have equal circle counts and equal powers of δ for each basis pair (h,x). Bilinearity proves the partial-trace identity. Together with steps 1.1–1.3 this proves all claims.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources