Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Jones–Wenzl projectors: annihilation, uniqueness, partial trace, and closure

Statement

Let R be a nonzero commutative ring with unit, δ∈R, and suppose [2],…,[n] are units. The projector pn of Jones–Wenzl recursion over unit quantum integers has coefficient 1 on the identity diagram, is nonzero and idempotent, and is annihilated on both sides by each Ui for 1≤i<n. Its corner is pnTLnpn=Rpn, so it is the unique idempotent with identity coefficient 1 and those two-sided annihilation conditions. For n≥1,

ptr⁡n(pn)=[n+1][n]pn−1,Tr⁡n(pn)=[n+1].

Only the displayed denominator units are assumed; δ need not be a unit.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A nonzero commutative ring R with unit, loop parameter δ, the recursive elements pr, and the diagram product convention.

[F1]

The initial values are p0=10, p1=11. For r≥1, the recursion is pr+1=Pr−([r]/[r+1])PrUrPr, with Pr=pr⊗1 and the stated unit conditions (Jones–Wenzl recursion over unit quantum integers).

[F2]

The generators satisfy Ui2=δUi, UiUi+1Ui=Ui, and distant commutation (The elementary diagram generators satisfy the local Temperley–Lieb relations).

[F3]

Quantum integers satisfy [r+1]=δ[r]−[r−1] (Temperley–Lieb quantum integers and quantum characteristic).

[F4]

Every basis endomorphism diagram is generated by the Ui; every nonidentity basis diagram has fewer than n through strands (Elementary cup-cap diagrams generate every finite planar pairing endomorphism diagram, Temperley–Lieb planar diagram data and endomorphism modules).

[F5]

The partial closure and unnormalized trace close the last strand and all strands, respectively (Unnormalized diagram closure and partial trace).

[F6]

For n≥1, closing a last identity strand gives a factor δ and full closure factors through the partial trace. For n≥2, closing Un−1 on its last strand gives the straight identity on the remaining strands (Diagram closure trace is cyclic and satisfies the tower rules).

Proof

technique · induction on the strand number
1.1F1F2F3baseIHgivenalgebra

At ranks 0 and 1, the initial projectors are identities and there are no generators; the diagram algebras are R, so nonzeroness, idempotence, annihilation, identity coefficient and the scalar-corner assertion hold directly. At rank 2, the recursion gives p2=1−δ−1U1 only when [2]=δ is a unit. Then p22=p2 follows from U12=δU1, U1p2=p2U1=0, and its identity coefficient is 1; it is nonzero because the identity and cup-cap diagrams are distinct basis vectors. For the strong induction step, assume the stated assertions for all projectors through pr [IH]. For r≥2, put Q=pr−1⊗1⊗1, a=Ur−1, b=Ur, and μ=[r−1]/[r]. The recursion gives Pr=Q−μQaQ. The supports of Q and b are disjoint, so they commute; using b2=δb and bab=b from [F2] gives bPrb=δQb−μQbabQ=(δ−μ)Qb=([r+1]/[r])Qb, where [F3] proves the last equality. Since QPr=Pr and Qb=bQ, this is the absorption identity needed below.

2.1F1F2IHstep 1.1algebra

Set X=PrbPr and c=[r]/[r+1]. Step 1.1 gives X2=Pr(bPrb)Pr=([r+1]/[r])X, hence pr+12=(Pr−cX)2=Pr−2cX+c2X2=Pr−cX=pr+1. Also bpr+1=bPr−cbPrbPr=0, because bPrb=([r+1]/[r])Qb and QbPr=bPr. By [IH], every earlier generator annihilates Pr on both sides. Horizontal reflection fixes the recursion and interchanges left and right, so pr+1Ur=0 too. The correction term has fewer than r+1 through strands, while Pr has identity coefficient 1; hence pr+1 has identity coefficient 1 and is nonzero.

3.1F4step 2.1algebra

If D is any nonidentity basis diagram, [F4] writes it as a nonempty word in the generators. Its rightmost letter annihilates pn on the left and its leftmost letter annihilates pn on the right, by step 2.1. Thus Dpn=pnD=0. Expanding any x∈TLn in the diagram basis gives pnxpn=λxpn for a scalar λx∈R, hence pnTLnpn=Rpn. If pn′ is another idempotent with identity coefficient 1 and the same annihilation, write pn=1+m, pn′=1+m′ with m,m′ linear combinations of nonidentity diagrams. The equalities pn′pn=pn and pn′pn=pn′ follow respectively from m′pn=0 and pn′m=0; therefore pn=pn′.

3.2F1F3F5F6step 2.1algebra

For n≥2, write pn=P−([n−1]/[n])PUn−1P with P=pn−1⊗1. Closing the last identity strand gives ptr⁡n(P)=δpn−1 by [F6]. Closing the last strand of Un−1 gives the straight identity, so ptr⁡n(PUn−1P)=pn−12=pn−1. Therefore ptr⁡n(pn)=(δ−[n−1]/[n])pn−1=([n+1]/[n])pn−1 by [F3]. For n=1, ptr⁡1(11)=δ10=[2]p0, the same formula.

4.1F3F5F6step 1.1step 3.2inductiondischarge-inductionalgebra∎

By [F6], Tr⁡0(p0)=1=[1]. Inductively, the partial-trace factorization gives Tr⁡n(pn)=Tr⁡n−1(ptr⁡n(pn))=([n+1]/[n])Tr⁡n−1(pn−1)=[n+1]. Together with steps 1.1–3.2, this completes the strong induction and proves all assertions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources