How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Diagonal tensor operators span the symmetric centralizer
Statement
Let be a finite-dimensional complex vector space, let , and let carry the left place action of (Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power). Write and let be the centralizer of the action. Then:
- (Canonical identification.) The linear map with on elementary tensors is a linear isomorphism, and it is equivariant for the place action of on and conjugation on . Hence restricts to an isomorphism from the invariant tensors, that is from the image of the symmetrization operator on (the -th symmetric tensor power of ), onto .
- (Spans.) The subspaces and of are both equal to the invariant tensors; equivalently, with and the unital -subalgebra of generated by all (the image of the diagonal action of as defined there, Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power),
All statements include , where and , and the case .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite-dimensional complex vector space , an integer , with its left -action, and .
defines a left -action on by linear maps, for ; the diagonal operators and the algebra are as displayed, with linear in (Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power).
If is a basis of , the elementary tensors form a basis of , and for the single element is a basis of (The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product, Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis).
The assignment is multilinear, so linear maps out of are the same as multilinear maps on (Finite iterated tensor products represent multilinear maps independently of parenthesization).
For finite-dimensional one has with , and matrix representation relative to bases is a vector-space isomorphism ( and for finite-dimensional , is a vector-space isomorphism ).
Every nonzero polynomial over an integral domain of degree has at most distinct roots. The characteristic polynomial of is , a monic polynomial of degree ; an operator is invertible if and only if its determinant is nonzero (A nonzero polynomial of degree over an integral domain has at most distinct roots, The basis-independent characteristic polynomial of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional space, including in dimension zero, A finite-dimensional linear operator over a field is invertible if and only if its determinant is nonzero).
is an infinite field.
In variables the elementary symmetric polynomial is , with for ; if is a unit in a commutative ring , then is a polynomial in the power sums with coefficients in (The elementary symmetric polynomials , If is invertible, then freely generate the symmetric-polynomial ring).
A unital ring homomorphism from a polynomial ring on generators over a commutative ring into a commutative -algebra exists uniquely with prescribed images of the (Universal property of a polynomial ring on an arbitrary family of indeterminates).
Proof
[construct] Fix . For fixed the assignment is linear in each variable, so is multilinear in the and its values in are linear in separately in each ; hence there is a unique linear map with the displayed value on every elementary tensor by [F3], and is multilinear in the because both sides of every identity are checked on the spanning elementary tensors by [F3]. By the representing property of the tensor product [F3] there is a unique linear with , which is the map of the Statement; in particular is linear and is given on elementary tensors as displayed. For one has and by the same universal property.
Let , a well-defined operator because in ; then , since each group element occurs times in the product sum, and commutes with the action, since left multiplication permutes the summands. Its image is exactly the invariant subspace : is invariant for every , and whenever is invariant. Thus the invariant tensors are the image of the symmetrization operator. Pure tensors span , so their symmetrizations span the image of . For , inclusion-exclusion gives Indeed, after expanding the right side, an ordered tensor survives exactly when every index occurs, which in a tensor with factors means each occurs once. Hence each symmetrized pure tensor is a linear combination of powers , and . For this equality is immediate in .
The two spans of the Statement are equal. One inclusion is clear, since . For the reverse let and consider the -valued polynomial ; expanding the tensor power of a sum gives with , so it is a polynomial of degree at most in . The function is a monic polynomial of degree by [F5], hence nonzero with at most roots by [F5], so by [F6] there exist distinct scalars with invertible for all by [F5] (if then and is invertible, so any distinct scalars work). For the Lagrange polynomials one has for every and every , because it holds at the distinct points and both sides have degree at most ; multiplying by and summing gives . Hence the two spans are equal.
The matrix units of with respect to a basis of form a basis of : define by ; every satisfies with the coefficients in , because the two sides agree on each basis vector of , and a relation evaluated at gives , so all . Likewise the endomorphisms of defined by for words form a basis of , indexed by the finite set ; for this is the single endomorphism of the one-dimensional space , and for and all these sets of words are empty and both spaces are zero. By [F2] and [F3] the tensors form a basis of , and sends such a tensor to by the formula of step 1.1; a linear map that carries a basis bijectively onto a basis is an isomorphism, so is a linear isomorphism.
is -equivariant for the place action on and conjugation on : for and the place action gives by [F1], so by step 1.1 both and map to ; two linear maps agreeing on the spanning elementary tensors agree, so the identity holds for all by linearity.
For one has . For this is , since is unital. Assume and put for ; these operators commute pairwise and , while for every , all by the tensor formula of step 1.1 and [F1]. By [F7] with (where is a unit) there is a polynomial in variables over with in , where . The operators commute, so the -subalgebra they generate is commutative, and the universal property of the polynomial ring [F8] gives a -algebra homomorphism sending ; it sends to by [F7] and to , so , since each lies in the generating algebra and has coefficients in .
For put (the empty sum for , giving ). Then by step 1.1, and is invariant under the place action: a permutation sends the -th summand, which has in position , to the same kind of summand with in position by [F1], and permutes the index set, so . By the equivariance of step 2.2, is fixed by conjugation by every , that is ; since is closed under addition and composition and is generated by the , this gives .
Combining steps: induces a bijection from onto by step 2.2 and step 2.1, the invariant subspace is by steps 1.2 and 1.3, and by steps 3.1 and 2.3, so all four subspaces of the Statement coincide. For : , is the identity, is trivial, for every , and , and the displayed chain reads . For and : , , both sides of the identity are the zero space, and . This proves both claims.
Remarks
-
What is used where. The basis argument of step 2.1 identifies with ; steps 1.2 and 1.3 are the polarization step, expressing an arbitrary invariant tensor through the powers and then through powers of invertible operators; step 2.3 is the Newton-identity argument identifying the algebra generated by the place operators with those powers. The interpolation in step 1.3 is where the field is used as an infinite field of characteristic zero; the statement is false in characteristic , where is not invertible.
-
The zero and empty cases. For the symmetric tensor power is the ground field and the whole claim degenerates to ; for and both and are the zero space, so . These are the only cases in which the basis argument of step 2.1 has no words .
-
Relation to the double centralizer. The equality identifies the commutant of the -image with the image of the diagonal -action. The converse commutant equality is the other half of the double-centralizer statement proved on this page (Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power).
-
No choice. All bases, matrix units and the finitely many scalars are chosen from explicit finite or countable ranges; the multilinear universal property of [F3] produces the maps without any selection, and no selection principle is used.
Depends on
- Commuting symmetric-group and linear actions on a tensor power
- The elementary tensors of two bases form the product basis of the tensor product
- Finite iterated tensor products represent multilinear maps independently of parenthesization
- $\dim_F M_{m\times n}(F)=mn$ and $\dim_F\mathcal L(V,W)=(\dim_FV)(\dim_FW)$ for finite-dimensional $V,W$
- $T\mapsto[T]_{\mathcal B}^{\mathcal C}$ is a vector-space isomorphism $\mathcal L(V,W)\cong M_{m\times n}(F)$
- Universal property of a polynomial ring on an arbitrary family of indeterminates
- If $n!$ is invertible, then $p_1,\ldots,p_n$ freely generate the symmetric-polynomial ring
- The elementary symmetric polynomials $e_0,e_1,\ldots,e_n$
- A finite-dimensional linear operator over a field is invertible if and only if its determinant is nonzero
- The basis-independent characteristic polynomial $\chi_T$ of an endomorphism of a finite-dimensional space, including $\chi_T=1$ in dimension zero
- A nonzero polynomial of degree $n$ over an integral domain has at most $n$ distinct roots
- Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis
- Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension $\dim_F V$; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof et al., Introduction to Representation Theory, MIT 18.712 Chapter 4, Sections 4.18-4.21, PDF pp. 18-21 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Hsueh-Yung Lin, Modern Algebra I, Section 27, printed pp. 71-74 (standard reference, not scraped)