Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-dimensional tensoring preserves projectives in category O

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let P be a projective object of O (Projective object) and let E be a finite-dimensional h-semisimple g-module (Weight and weight space). Then E⊗P belongs to O and is projective in O.

The same tensor adjunction shows that if I is injective in O, then E⊗I is injective.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, a projective P∈O, an injective I∈O, and a finite-dimensional h-semisimple g-module E.

[F1]

For finite-dimensional h-semisimple E, the functor M↦E⊗M with diagonal action is exact and maps O into itself; its linear dual E∗ is again finite-dimensional h-semisimple, and evaluation and coevaluation give the tensor-Hom adjunction, natural in the g-modules M and X (Finite-dimensional tensoring preserves O, Weight and weight space).

[F2]

An object P is projective exactly when Hom⁡O(P,−) is exact, equivalently when Hom⁡(P,E)→Hom⁡(P,M) is surjective for every epimorphism E↠M (Projective object, Projective object characterisations).

[F3]

Injectivity means that Hom⁡(−,I) sends monomorphisms to surjections, equivalently is exact; this follows from the extension property and left exactness of contravariant Hom (Injective object).

Proof

technique · direct, through the tensor-Hom adjunction and exactness of tensoring with a finite-dimensional module
1.1F1given

For every X∈O the tensor-Hom adjunction of [F1] gives a natural isomorphism Hom⁡O(E⊗P,X)≅Hom⁡O(P,E∗⊗X), and E∗ is finite-dimensional h-semisimple with E∗⊗− an exact endofunctor of O.

1.2F1F3algebra

If I is injective, evaluation and coevaluation for the ordinary contragredient dual E∗ give Hom⁡O(X,E⊗I)≅Hom⁡O(E∗⊗X,I), naturally in X. Since E∗⊗− is exact by [F1] and Hom⁡(−,I) is exact by [F3], their composite is exact. Thus E⊗I is injective.

2.1F1F2step 1.1

Since E⊗P∈O by [F1], the functor Hom⁡O(E⊗P,−) is naturally isomorphic to the composite of the exact functor X↦E∗⊗X and the exact functor Hom⁡O(P,−) of [F2]; composites of exact functors are exact, so Hom⁡O(E⊗P,−) is exact and [F2] makes E⊗P projective in O.

3.1step 2.1step 1.2∎

Steps 2.1 and 1.2 prove that finite-dimensional tensoring preserves both projectives and injectives in O.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources