How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite-dimensional tensoring preserves projectives in category O
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let be a projective object of (Projective object) and let be a finite-dimensional -semisimple -module (Weight and weight space). Then belongs to and is projective in .
The same tensor adjunction shows that if is injective in , then is injective.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, a projective , an injective , and a finite-dimensional -semisimple -module .
For finite-dimensional -semisimple , the functor with diagonal action is exact and maps into itself; its linear dual is again finite-dimensional -semisimple, and evaluation and coevaluation give the tensor-Hom adjunction, natural in the -modules and (Finite-dimensional tensoring preserves O, Weight and weight space).
An object is projective exactly when is exact, equivalently when is surjective for every epimorphism (Projective object, Projective object characterisations).
Injectivity means that sends monomorphisms to surjections, equivalently is exact; this follows from the extension property and left exactness of contravariant Hom (Injective object).
Proof
For every the tensor-Hom adjunction of [F1] gives a natural isomorphism , and is finite-dimensional -semisimple with an exact endofunctor of .
If is injective, evaluation and coevaluation for the ordinary contragredient dual give , naturally in . Since is exact by [F1] and is exact by [F3], their composite is exact. Thus is injective.
Since by [F1], the functor is naturally isomorphic to the composite of the exact functor and the exact functor of [F2]; composites of exact functors are exact, so is exact and [F2] makes projective in .
Steps 2.1 and 1.2 prove that finite-dimensional tensoring preserves both projectives and injectives in .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Pavel Etingof, Representations of Lie Groups (18.757, Fall 2023), Corollary 16.5 and its proof (standard reference, not scraped)
- Lin Chen, lecture notes (Spring 2024), Lecture 9, Lemma 3.3 (standard reference, not scraped)