Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Transport of a lattice spectral measure to torus coordinates

Statement

Let Ψ:Td→Zd^ be the homeomorphism from The Pontryagin dual of the integer lattice is the torus, and let μ be a finite positive Radon measure on Zd^. Define F(B):=μ(Ψ(B)) for every Borel set B⊆Td. Then F is a finite positive Radon measure on Td, and for every bounded Borel function g:Td→C, ∫Tdg(θ) F(dθ)=∫Zd^g(Ψ−1(χ)) μ(dχ).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The homeomorphism Ψ and the finite positive Radon measure μ from the Statement.

[F1]

The Pontryagin dual of the integer lattice is the torus: Ψ is a homeomorphism, so it and its inverse preserve Borel measurability, compactness and openness.

[F2]

Radon measure on an LCH space: a Radon measure is finite on compact sets, outer regular on Borel sets and inner regular on open sets.

[F3]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ), Every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of simple measurable functions, and Monotone convergence for the integral: integrals of simple functions are linear, every nonnegative measurable function is the increasing limit of nonnegative measurable simple functions, and increasing limits pass through the integral.

[F5]

Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: bounded Borel functions are integrable against the finite measures in the Statement.

Proof

Proof technique: define the transported measure and extend its integral identity from indicators.

1.1F1given

If B1,B2,… are pairwise disjoint Borel subsets of Td, then their images under the bijection Ψ are pairwise disjoint Borel sets by [F1]. Hence F ⁣(⋃m≥1Bm)=μ ⁣(⋃m≥1Ψ(Bm))=∑m≥1μ(Ψ(Bm))=∑m≥1F(Bm). Thus F is a positive measure, and F(Td)=μ(Zd^)<∞.

1.2F1F2F4given

For Borel B⊆Td and ε>0, outer regularity of μ gives an open U⊇Ψ(B) with μ(U)<μ(Ψ(B))+ε. Then Ψ−1(U) is open, contains B, and F(Ψ−1(U))=μ(U), proving outer regularity of F. If U is open in Td, inner regularity of μ gives compact C⊆Ψ(U) with μ(C)>μ(Ψ(U))−ε. Then Ψ−1(C) is compact in U and F(Ψ−1(C))=μ(C), proving inner regularity on open sets. The torus is compact Hausdorff by [F4], so these properties make F Radon as in [F2].

2.1F1F3F5algebra∎

For an indicator g=1B of a Borel set, ∫g dF=F(B)=μ(Ψ(B))=∫1B(Ψ−1(χ)) μ(dχ). Finite linearity [F3] extends this equality to Borel simple functions. For a nonnegative Borel function g, the simple-approximation theorem [F3] supplies Borel simple functions sm↑g. Since Ψ−1 is continuous, sm∘Ψ−1↑g∘Ψ−1 measurably on the dual. Applying monotone convergence [F3] to the simple-function identity on both spaces gives the asserted identity for g. Splitting the real and imaginary parts of a bounded complex Borel function into positive and negative parts then gives the stated identity by [F5].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources