Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-sided Mills bounds for the standard normal tail

Statement

Let φ(x)=(2π)−1/2e−x2/2 and Φ‾(x)=∫x∞φ(y) dy for x∈R. Then for every x>0 x φ(x)1+x2 ≤ Φ‾(x) ≤ φ(x)x, and consequently, for every x>1, (1x−1x3)φ(x) ≤ Φ‾(x) ≤ φ(x)x. Both bounds are sharp as x→∞ in the sense that the ratio of each side to Φ‾(x) tends to 1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, ACω, DC, and a real x>0.

[F1]

φ is the strictly positive, Borel measurable standard normal density, with ∫Rφ=1, and N(0,1) is the probability measure φ dy. Standard normal and normal laws The standard normal density has total mass one

[F2]

On a compact interval every C1 function is Lipschitz, hence absolutely continuous and of bounded variation; in particular φ and y↦1/y are absolutely continuous on [x,R] for 0<x<R. C1 implies Lipschitz, Lipschitz implies absolutely continuous, and absolutely continuous implies continuous and bounded variation

[F3]

Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions: ∫abFG′+∫abF′G=F(b)G(b)−F(a)G(a), under ACω and DC. Integration by parts for absolutely continuous functions The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain

[F4]

Substitution computes ∫xRy e−y2/2 dy=e−x2/2−e−R2/2, and monotone convergence justifies passing to the limit R→∞ in the integrals of the nonnegative functions φ and φ(y)/y2 over [x,R]. Substitution: if φ is differentiable on [c,d] with φ′ integrable and f is continuous on an interval containing φ([c,d]), then ∫φ(c)φ(d)f=∫cd(f∘φ) φ′ Monotone convergence for the integral

[F5]

AC is the ambient assumption; ACω and DC are the hypotheses of the integration-by-parts interface used in [F3]. The Axiom of Choice The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω) The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F4

For y≥x>0 one has φ(y)≤(y/x)φ(y); integrating over [x,R] and letting R→∞ with [F4] gives Φ‾(x)≤1x∫x∞yφ(y) dy, and [F4] computes ∫xRyφ(y) dy=(2π)−1/2(e−x2/2−e−R2/2)→φ(x), so Φ‾(x)≤φ(x)/x.

1.2F2F3

For 0<x<R, [F2] and [F3] applied to F(y)=1/y and G=φ on [x,R], together with φ′(y)=−yφ(y), give ∫xRφ(y) dy=φ(x)/x−φ(R)/R−∫xRφ(y)y−2 dy.

2.1step 1.2F4

Letting R→∞ in [step 1.2] with [F4] gives Φ‾(x)=φ(x)/x−∫x∞φ(y)y−2 dy, and since y−2≤x−2 on [x,∞) one gets Φ‾(x)≥φ(x)/x−Φ‾(x)/x2, that is, Φ‾(x) (1+x−2)≥φ(x)/x and hence Φ‾(x)≥xφ(x)/(1+x2).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1

The algebraic comparison x/(1+x2)≥(1/x−1/x3) for x>0 is equivalent to x4≥(x2−1)(1+x2)=x4−1, which holds; combining it with [step 2.1] gives the displayed form for x>1, and the ratio claim follows because (1/x−1/x3)/(1/x)=1−x−2→1 and (x/(1+x2))/(1/x)=1/(1+x−2)→1 while the upper bound already is φ(x)/x.

4.1step 1.2step 2.1F3F5given∎

The endpoint and degenerate cases are covered: x>0 is required so that 1/x and the integration interval [x,R] are meaningful and F=1/y is C1 on it; x=0 is excluded by the statement because the upper bound would divide by zero, while Φ‾(0)=12 is finite; the limit R→∞ is handled by monotone convergence over the increasing family [x,R]; the constants ACω and DC are those declared for [F3] and are used nowhere else; and AC enters only through [F5].

Source notes

Durrett, Lemma 1.2.6 and the estimates (8.5.2) in the proof of Theorem 8.5.1, states the two-sided bound (x−1−x−3)e−x2/2≤∫x∞e−y2/2dy≤x−1e−x2/2 for x>0 (up to the normalization constant), together with the asymptotic ratio 1 used in the law of the iterated logarithm. The proof above derives the stronger lower bound xφ(x)/(1+x2) from the identity obtained by integrating by parts, which is the form consumed by the LIL item.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

70 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources