Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Two-torsion and uniqueness of the group law on a Weierstrass cubic

Statement

Assume AC. Let k be a field of characteristic not 2 or 3, let a,b∈k with 4a3+27b2≠0, and let C be the smooth cubic Y2Z=X3+aXZ2+bZ3 with O=[0:1:0], regarded as an abelian variety by The chord-tangent group law on a smooth short Weierstrass cubic. Then:

(a) scheme-theoretically, C[2] is the disjoint union of O≅Spec⁡k and Spec⁡k[x]/(x3+ax+b) in the affine chart y=0; its geometric points are O and the three points [x:0:1] with x3+ax+b=0; in particular C[2](k)={O} if and only if x3+ax+b has no root in k;

(b) if C carries any abelian-variety structure with unit section O, then that group law equals the chord-tangent law.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC, a field k of characteristic not 2 or 3, a,b∈k with 4a3+27b2≠0, the cubic C:Y2Z=X3+aXZ2+bZ3 with origin O=[0:1:0], and an abelian-variety group law ∗ on C with unit O.

[F1]

The chord-tangent law makes C an abelian variety over k with inversion [X:Y:Z]↦[X:−Y:Z] and with the affine formulas of The chord-tangent group law on a smooth short Weierstrass cubic; in particular the difference of the two laws is measured by the identity morphism of the underlying curve.

[F2]

A k-morphism from a smooth geometrically integral group variety to an abelian variety which sends the unit to the unit is a group homomorphism (Pointed morphisms from smooth geometrically integral groups to abelian varieties are homomorphisms, assuming AC).

[F3]

Every abelian variety is commutative (A proper geometrically connected group variety is commutative), and the definitions and conventions are those of Abelian varieties over a field.

Proof

technique · direct: compute the fixed points of inversion for (a), and compare two laws by the pointed-morphism theorem for (b)
1.1F1givenalgebra

In the chord-tangent law, 2P=O if and only if P=−P, i.e. if and only if P is fixed by the inversion [X:Y:Z]↦[X:−Y:Z]. For P≠O write P=[x:y:1]; the fixed-point condition is y=−y, hence y=0 because char⁡k≠2, and such points satisfy x3+ax+b=0. These equalities also compute the scheme-theoretic kernel: [2]=0 is equivalent on all tests to equality of identity and inversion. On Z=1 its ideal is (2y)=(y). Near O use the chart Y=1 with coordinates u=X/Y, v=Z/Y; inversion sends (u,v) to (−u,−v), so its equalizer has ideal (u,v), defining the single reduced point O.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

The polynomial x3+ax+b has three distinct roots in an algebraic closure: a common root of x3+ax+b and its derivative 3x2+a would force y=0 in the smoothness computation, i.e. would give 3x2=−a, x3=b/2 and hence 4a3+27b2=0, contrary to the hypothesis; so the discriminant −(4a3+27b2) is nonzero. Hence C[2](kˉ) consists exactly of O and the three points [x:0:1] over the roots, and C[2](k)={O} exactly when the cubic has no k-root. These are two-torsion points, not inflection points; inflection points satisfy 3P=O instead.

3.1F2F3step 2.1algebra∎

For (b), let ∗ be the given abelian-variety law with unit O. The identity morphism id⁡:(C,⋅)→(C,∗) carries the unit of the chord-tangent law to the unit of ∗, and the source is a smooth geometrically integral group variety and the target an abelian variety, so by [F2] it is a group homomorphism; being an isomorphism of schemes, it is an isomorphism of group varieties, so the two laws coincide. The reverse implication is the same statement read backwards, and both laws are commutative by [F3].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources