How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two-torsion and uniqueness of the group law on a Weierstrass cubic
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a field of characteristic not or , let with , and let be the smooth cubic with , regarded as an abelian variety by The chord-tangent group law on a smooth short Weierstrass cubic. Then:
(a) scheme-theoretically, is the disjoint union of and in the affine chart ; its geometric points are and the three points with ; in particular if and only if has no root in ;
(b) if carries any abelian-variety structure with unit section , then that group law equals the chord-tangent law.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a field of characteristic not or , with , the cubic with origin , and an abelian-variety group law on with unit .
The chord-tangent law makes an abelian variety over with inversion and with the affine formulas of The chord-tangent group law on a smooth short Weierstrass cubic; in particular the difference of the two laws is measured by the identity morphism of the underlying curve.
A -morphism from a smooth geometrically integral group variety to an abelian variety which sends the unit to the unit is a group homomorphism (Pointed morphisms from smooth geometrically integral groups to abelian varieties are homomorphisms, assuming AC).
Every abelian variety is commutative (A proper geometrically connected group variety is commutative), and the definitions and conventions are those of Abelian varieties over a field.
Proof
In the chord-tangent law, if and only if , i.e. if and only if is fixed by the inversion . For write ; the fixed-point condition is , hence because , and such points satisfy . These equalities also compute the scheme-theoretic kernel: is equivalent on all tests to equality of identity and inversion. On its ideal is . Near use the chart with coordinates , ; inversion sends to , so its equalizer has ideal , defining the single reduced point .
The polynomial has three distinct roots in an algebraic closure: a common root of and its derivative would force in the smoothness computation, i.e. would give , and hence , contrary to the hypothesis; so the discriminant is nonzero. Hence consists exactly of and the three points over the roots, and exactly when the cubic has no -root. These are two-torsion points, not inflection points; inflection points satisfy instead.
For (b), let be the given abelian-variety law with unit . The identity morphism carries the unit of the chord-tangent law to the unit of , and the source is a smooth geometrically integral group variety and the target an abelian variety, so by [F2] it is a group homomorphism; being an isomorphism of schemes, it is an isomorphism of group varieties, so the two laws coincide. The reverse implication is the same statement read backwards, and both laws are commutative by [F3].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Elliptic Curves, v2.0, Chapter III (two-torsion and the group law) (standard reference, not scraped)