How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Type-S posterior contracts in quotient log-density coordinates without a tail restriction on a log-Lipschitz prior
Statement
Assume AC for the imported measure and Gaussian interfaces. Use Type-S priors and either cutoff of Type-S log-density and type-H histogram prior families with the compact multiresolution basis of Compact wavelet projections approximate smooth functions and commute asymptotically with multiplication, regular enough for the truth's Hölder approximation. Suppose , , and . In S1 take and any probability density whose logarithm is Lipschitz on all of . In S2 take Gaussian coefficients with and .
Write , , , , and . Under IID data of density , the posterior distributions of are tight in probability. Equivalently, for every deterministic , in -probability. The normalizer defining the posterior is positive and finite -almost surely. The quotient prior has a positive continuous Lebesgue density on . In S1 it obeys and a shift in a single high wavelet coordinate obeys the sharper bound . The low scaling block has a fixed finite collection of analogous weighted bounds. In S2 the quotient prior is centered Gaussian, with precision diagonal on high wavelets with entries and a fixed positive definite low scaling block. Its log-density increment is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC and the density, basis, cutoff, coefficient, and regularity hypotheses of the Statement.
Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product permits integration of nonnegative likelihoods in either order.
Markov's inequality for random variables bounds a nonnegative variable's upper tail by its expectation divided by the threshold.
Proof
Quotient out constants before using likelihood curvature. Constants belong to the fixed low scaling space. An orthogonal change within that finite space separates ; integrate out of the prior and write for the resulting Lebesgue density on . The likelihood depends only on . In S1 its product density before integration obeys , where . Integrating preserves both inequalities for ; it is positive, finite almost everywhere, and the log-Lipschitz inequality supplies its positive continuous finite version everywhere. In S2 the marginal is a nondegenerate Gaussian on , with precision equal to on high wavelets and a fixed positive definite low block; hence .
Let . [F1] gives . For , the centered score at has expected squared Euclidean norm at most : sum the coordinate variances, each bounded by by orthonormality. The score's deterministic mean is the coefficient vector of , with norm at most . Consequently [F3] gives . On every ball with fixed , [F1] and make bounded uniformly above and away from zero. For , lies between and , using . Thus is between and on these balls. Convexity of holds globally.
In S1, by either cutoff. In S2 the Hölder coefficient bound gives , so , and because . The Gaussian log-density increment is exactly . In particular its radial upper slope is at most , and on the ball it is bounded below by .
Fix a score event . Put , with a large fixed constant. Taylor's formula on the ball bounds above by and its radial derivative above by . Global convexity of extends this derivative bound to every . Add the prior bound in S1, or with its nonpositive quadratic term in S2. For large enough the log unnormalized posterior ratio relative to is at most for all . On , the lower Taylor bound and the prior lower bounds instead give .
Polar integration in dimension bounds the tail/normalizer ratio by . Here . Choose so large that for and . The integral is then at most after decreasing , and tends to zero. The denominator used here is the integral on the ball, at least its volume times times the positive unnormalized value at . First increase to make its score event arbitrarily probable, then increase . This proves tightness. For any , eventual containment of every fixed ball in the ball yields the stated equivalent formulation.
Every modeled density is everywhere positive. Its prior predictive product density is positive and integrates to one by [F2], so it is finite Lebesgue-almost everywhere on the sample cube. The law has a bounded Lebesgue density, hence the same exceptional set is -null. This proves finite positive evidence on the asserted fibers independently of the score event.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Castillo, On Bayesian supremum norm contraction rates, §3.2.1 and §4.3; preliminary contraction here obtained by a finite-dimensional likelihood argument (standard reference, not scraped)
- Castillo and Nickl, On the Bernstein–von Mises phenomenon for nonparametric Bayes procedures, §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)