Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Products converge uniformly when both factors converge uniformly and one limiting factor and one approximating family are uniformly bounded

Statement

Let X be a set, and suppose fk→f and gk→g uniformly on X. Assume there are reals B,C≥0 such that

∣f(x)∣≤Band∣gk(x)∣≤C

for every x∈X and every k∈N. Then fkgk→fg uniformly on X.

The same conclusion holds after interchanging the two factors: it is enough that one limit function and the approximating sequence of the other factor have uniform bounds.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Uniform convergence fk→f and gk→g on X, with bounds ∣f(x)∣≤B and ∣gk(x)∣≤C for all x,k.

[A1]

Uniform convergence gives one index serving all points for any prescribed positive real error (Pointwise convergence, uniform convergence, and the uniformly Cauchy condition for sequences of real-valued functions).

[A2]

A subset of R is bounded when it has real lower and upper bounds; the displayed absolute-value inequalities are the corresponding uniform bounds on the ranges (Lower bound, bounded below, bounded set).

[L1]

For reals u,v,c, ∣u+v∣≤∣u∣+∣v∣ and ∣cu∣=∣c∣∣u∣ (The triangle inequality, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let ε>0 be real and put η:=ε/(B+C+1)>0.

construct
1.2

Choose N such that, for every k≥N and every x∈X, both ∣fk(x)−f(x)∣<η and ∣gk(x)−g(x)∣<η.

A1choose
2.1

For k≥N and x∈X, add and subtract f(x)gk(x) to obtain ∣fk(x)gk(x)−f(x)g(x)∣≤∣gk(x)∣ ∣fk(x)−f(x)∣+∣f(x)∣ ∣gk(x)−g(x)∣<(B+C)η<ε.

step 1.1step 1.2A2L1algebra
3.1

Since N is independent of x, step 2.1 proves fkgk→fg uniformly. Interchanging the names of the factors gives the symmetric clause.

step 2.1A1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources