Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Verma self-extensions in O split

Statement

Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, a Cartan subalgebra h, and a positive Borel b=hn+. Write Q+=iZ0αi, μλ when λμQ+, and wλ=w(λ+ρ)ρ.

Every short exact sequence 0M(λ)EpM(λ)0 in O splits.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The setting above and the hypotheses in the statement.

[F1]

Fix a finite-dimensional complex semisimple Lie algebra g, a Cartan subalgebra h, and a positive Borel b=hn+. Write Q+=iZ0αi, μλ when λμQ+, and wλ=w(λ+ρ)ρ. The category O is closed under submodules, quotients and finite direct sums and is an abelian category. If 0AEB0 is exact, A,BO, and E is h-semisimple, then EO. The middle-term weight hypothesis is essential. (Category O is abelian and extension closed among weight modules)

[F2]

For a g-module V, sending a homomorphism T:M(λ)V to T(vλ) is a bijection onto the vectors vV of weight λ annihilated by n+. Here M(λ) is def-verma-module. The nonzero vectors in this target are precisely the highest-weight vectors of weight λ from def-highest-weight-vector-and-cyclic-highest-weight-module; the zero vector corresponds to the zero homomorphism. (The universal property of Verma modules)

[F3]

The weights of M(λ) are exactly λβ for βQ+; every weight space is finite dimensional, and M(λ)λ=Cvλ. (Weights of a Verma module lie below lambda)

Proof

1.1

Weightwise exactness and the Verma support formula imply that E has no weights outside λQ+. Lift the highest vector to an actual vector vEλ, using the surjection on that weight space. Every positive-root operator kills v since its target weight is absent.

F1F3choose
2.1

The universal property supplies s:M(λ)E taking its highest vector to v. The composite ps fixes the highest generator, hence equals the identity on the cyclic module. Thus s is a section. No integrality or regularity condition on λ was used.

F2algebrastep 1.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources