Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedaudited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Complexification has a canonical conjugation with fixed algebra g zero

Statement

Let g0 be a finite-dimensional real Lie algebra with complexification gC=g0RC, real embedding ε and bracket [Xz,Yw]=[X,Y]zw (Complexification of a real Lie algebra). Then the following hold.

  1. The bracket is well-defined and makes gC a complex Lie algebra, and ε is an injective real Lie-algebra homomorphism.
  2. The assignment σ(Xz)=Xz, extended by σ(Z1+Z2)=σ(Z1)+σ(Z2), is a well-defined conjugate-linear involution of gC, and σ([Z,W])=[σZ,σW] for all Z,W.
  3. The fixed locus gCσ={Z:σZ=Z} equals ε(g0), so that ε(g0) is a real Lie subalgebra of gC naturally identified with g0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A finite-dimensional real Lie algebra g0, its real tensor product gC=g0RC, and the assignment θ(Xz)=Xz on pure tensors, extended additively to gC.

[L1]

gC is the free Z-module on g0×C modulo the subgroup generated by the relations (X+X,z)(X,z)(X,z), (X,z+z)(X,z)(X,z), (cX,z)(X,cz) and (X,cz)(cX,z) for cR, and the elementary tensors generate it additively (The tensor product MRN from the additive group underlying the free Z-module on M×N, elementary tensors, and finite tensor sums).

[L2]

By the universal property of the tensor product, for every real vector space U and every R-bilinear map β ⁣:g0×CU there is a unique R-linear β~ ⁣:gCU with β~(Xz)=β(X,z). The additive factorization is Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups; real linearity follows by checking β~(c(Xz))=β(X,cz)=cβ(X,z) on elementary tensors.

[L3]

g0 is a real Lie algebra with bilinear, alternating bracket satisfying the Jacobi identity, and scalar multiplication by C transports to gC by t(Xz)=Xtz (Lie algebras over a field, Complexification of a real Lie algebra).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The bracket formula of [L3] is R-bilinear in the pair (Xz,Yw) and vanishes on each tensor-product relation in either slot, since [X+X,Y]zw=[X,Y]zw+[X,Y]zw and [cX,Y]zw=c[X,Y]zw for cR; hence [L2] gives a well-defined R-bilinear map gC×gCgC with the stated values on pure tensors. It is complex-bilinear because [(tZ),W]=t[Z,W] and [Z,tW]=t[Z,W], both checked on pure tensors and extended by R-linearity in each argument.

L1L2L3algebra
1.2

The assignment θ is additive on pure tensors and vanishes on every relation of [L1], since (X+X)z=Xz+Xz, Xz+z=Xz+Xz, and conjugation is R-linear, so that the relation (X,cz)(cX,z) for cR becomes XczcXz=0; by [L1] and the additive generation of gC by elementary tensors, θ extends uniquely to a well-defined additive map σ ⁣:gCgC with σ(Xz)=Xz.

L1L2algebra
2.1

For pure tensors u=Xz, v=Yw, alternation in g0 implies [X,Y]=[Y,X] by expansion of [X+Y,X+Y]=0. Thus [u,v]+[v,u]=([X,Y]+[Y,X])zw=0 and [u,u]=0. For an arbitrary finite tensor sum Z=aua, bilinearity now gives [Z,Z]=a[ua,ua]+a<b([ua,ub]+[ub,ua])=0. Jacobi, unlike alternation, is trilinear: on three pure tensors it is the Jacobi expression in g0 tensored with the product of their scalars, hence zero, and trilinearity extends it to arbitrary finite sums. This proves the complex Lie-algebra axioms.

L1L3step 1.1algebra
2.2

σ is conjugate-linear: it is additive by construction, and σ(t(Xz))=Xtz=t(Xz)=tσ(Xz) for complex t; both sides are additive in the argument, so the identity extends to all of gC. It is involutive because σ2(Xz)=Xz on pure tensors and σ2 is additive. Finally σ preserves brackets: on pure tensors σ([Xz,Yw])=[X,Y]zw=[Xz,Yw]=[σ(Xz),σ(Yw)], and since both sides are additive and the bracket and σ are additive, the identity extends to all pairs.

step 1.1step 1.2algebra
3.1

Choose a real basis e1,,en of g0. Every tensor has an expression Z=jejzj: expand each real factor of a finite sum of pure tensors in this basis and use the tensor relations. This expression is unique, because for the dual basis functional ej the bilinear map (Y,z)ej(Y)z induces by [L2] a real-linear map φj:gCC with φj(Z)=zj. Consequently σZ=Z if and only if zj=zj for every j, equivalently zjR for every j. In that case Z=jejzj=(jzjej)1=ε(jzjej), while every element of ε(g0) is visibly fixed. Thus the fixed locus is exactly ε(g0).

L1L2step 2.2algebra
4.1

ε is injective: if X0, extend X to an R-basis of g0 and let λ be the dual basis functional with λ(X)=1; the R-bilinear map (Y,z)λ(Y)z induces by [L2] an R-linear φ ⁣:gCC with φ(Yz)=λ(Y)z, so φ(X1)=1 and X10. Moreover ε([X,Y])=[X,Y]1=[X1,Y1]=[εX,εY] by the bracket formula, so ε is an injective real Lie-algebra homomorphism. Together with step 3.1 this identifies gCσ with g0 as a real Lie subalgebra.

L1L2L3step 1.1step 3.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources