How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Complexification is conjugation invariant
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a path-connected paracompact Hausdorff CW complex, let be a numerable real vector bundle with complexification , and let all complex bundles below be numerable bundles over . Then:
- is canonically complex-linearly isomorphic to its conjugate ;
- for every such complex vector bundle the conjugate bundle satisfies
Facts & Assumptions
The Axiom of Choice is assumed, exactly as inherited from the bundle, splitting and metric suppliers (The Axiom of Choice).
Conjugation, direct sums and pullback are given by their transition matrices (Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles, Real and complex topological vector bundles). Continuous linear transition cocycles glue vector bundles (Vector bundles are glued from transition cocycles).
For a complex line , , with when a Hermitian metric is chosen (First Chern class of tensor, dual, and conjugate lines).
On CW bases Chern classes are natural, normalized on lines and multiplicative over Whitney sums (Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes). A positive-rank complex bundle has a flag splitting with integral injective pullback and a CW-type total base (Complex splitting principle with integral injective pullback).
Homotopic maps induce equal cohomology maps, so a homotopy equivalence induces a cohomology isomorphism (Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology).
Proof
Given: AC, a real bundle and a complex bundle over a path-connected CW base.
Complexification is constructed by viewing the real transition matrices of as complex matrices; the same cocycle and numeration define a complex vector bundle by [F1]. Its fibers identify with . The map , , is complex-linear: while in the conjugate structure is by definition ; real balancing makes this tensor formula well defined. In every real bundle chart it is ordinary coordinate conjugation, which commutes with real transition matrices. It and its inverse are continuous by that same local formula, so it is an isomorphism of complex bundles. This is assertion 1.
For a complex line , conjugating transition functions inverts the first Chern class: , which identifies the conjugate of each root with its negative.
First suppose has rank . Let be its flag splitting from [F3], and choose a homotopy equivalence from a path-connected CW complex with a vertex. Write and , so and by the transition formulas of [F1]. These are bundles over the actual CW base , where [F3] gives Whitney multiplication. Put . Naturality and step 1.2 give and . Every degree- elementary symmetric monomial has exactly factors, so . No root transformation is attributed to a metric theorem, and no CW-only Whitney interface is applied on the merely CW-type space .
The map is injective, because is injective by [F3] and is an isomorphism by [F4]. Thus the equality in step 2.1 descends to . If has rank zero, its conjugate is again zero and [F3] gives and all higher classes zero, so the same conclusion holds without a flag construction.
Applying assertion 2 to and using the canonical isomorphism of step 1.1 gives , so the odd Chern classes of a complexified real bundle are two-torsion; this consistency is used in the next items.
Boundary cases. Rank zero was settled in step 3.1. For both sides are ; for a rank-one the statement is step 1.2. The empty base is excluded by the path-connected hypothesis, and the coefficient ring is nonzero. The metric is used only to identify with inside [F2]; no orientation or choice of frames enters. AC is used only through [A1] in the splitting and metric suppliers.
Source notes
Miller's Lecture 36 (printed pp. 134-137) uses this conjugation symmetry: the complexification of a real bundle is isomorphic to its conjugate, so the odd Chern classes of a complexified bundle are two-torsion and disappear after inverting two.
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- Whitney sum, tensor, dual, Hom, and exterior-power bundles
- Real and complex topological vector bundles
- Vector bundles are glued from transition cocycles
- First Chern class of tensor, dual, and conjugate lines
- Naturality, normalization, and Whitney sum for Chern classes
- Complex splitting principle with integral injective pullback
- Homotopic maps induce equal maps in singular cohomology
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Miller, MIT 18.906 Algebraic Topology II, Lecture 36 (standard reference, not scraped)