How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
For a field, the ring-matrix operations, invertibility and similarity agree exactly with the established field-matrix interface
Statement
Let be a field. Viewing as a commutative ring, the ring-valued matrix set, addition, multiplication, identity, transpose, invertibility, inverse and similarity defined here are exactly the corresponding established field-matrix notions.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field regarded as a commutative ring.
A ring-valued matrix is a function (Finite rectangular matrices over a commutative ring, their entries, rows and columns).
Ring-matrix operations, products, identities and transpose use the entrywise finite-sum formulas (Entrywise ring-matrix operations, rectangular matrix products, identity matrices and transpose).
A field-valued matrix is a function (The vector space of by matrices over a field, with entrywise operations).
Field-matrix products and identities use the same formulas (Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix , including zero-sized shapes).
Field-matrix transpose interchanges the same entries (The transpose of a matrix).
Every field is a commutative ring with the same operations and identities (Every field is a commutative ring with ; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring).
Ring-matrix invertibility and similarity are defined by and (Invertible square matrices and similarity over a commutative ring).
Field-matrix invertibility uses the same two-sided inverse equations (Invertible matrices and the general linear group ).
Field-matrix similarity uses the same conjugation equation (Similar matrices: for an invertible ).
Proof
By [L1], [L3] and [L6], both matrix carriers are the same function set. The formulas in [L2], [L4] and [L5] agree entry for entry, including empty sums and zero-sized shapes.
Since the products and identities agree, the two-sided inverse equations in [L7] and [L8] select the same matrices and the same unique inverses; then the conjugation formulas in [L7] and [L9] select the same similar pairs.
Depends on
- Finite rectangular matrices over a commutative ring, their entries, rows and columns
- Entrywise ring-matrix operations, rectangular matrix products, identity matrices and transpose
- Invertible square matrices and similarity over a commutative ring
- The vector space $M_{m \times n}(F) := F^{\,m \times n}$ of $m$ by $n$ matrices over a field, with entrywise operations
- Rectangular matrix multiplication and the identity matrix $I_n$, including zero-sized shapes
- The transpose $A^{\mathsf T}$ of a matrix
- Invertible matrices and the general linear group $\operatorname{GL}_n(F)$
- Similar matrices: $B=P^{-1}AP$ for an invertible $P$
- Every field is a commutative ring with $1 \ne 0$; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 60 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. New, MATH 146 Linear Algebra 1 Lecture Notes, Ch. 4 (standard reference, not scraped)