Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For a field, the ring-matrix operations, invertibility and similarity agree exactly with the established field-matrix interface

Statement

Let F be a field. Viewing F as a commutative ring, the ring-valued matrix set, addition, multiplication, identity, transpose, invertibility, inverse and similarity defined here are exactly the corresponding established field-matrix notions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field F regarded as a commutative ring.

[L1]

A ring-valued m×n matrix is a function m×n→F (Finite rectangular matrices over a commutative ring, their entries, rows and columns).

[L2]

Ring-matrix operations, products, identities and transpose use the entrywise finite-sum formulas (Entrywise ring-matrix operations, rectangular matrix products, identity matrices and transpose).

[L4]
[L5]

Field-matrix transpose interchanges the same entries (The transpose AT of a matrix).

[L6]

Every field is a commutative ring with the same operations and identities (Every field is a commutative ring with 1≠0; it is an integral domain, and it is a commutative division ring).

[L7]

Ring-matrix invertibility and similarity are defined by AB=BA=I and B=P−1AP (Invertible square matrices and similarity over a commutative ring).

[L8]

Field-matrix invertibility uses the same two-sided inverse equations (Invertible matrices and the general linear group GL⁡n(F)).

[L9]

Field-matrix similarity uses the same conjugation equation (Similar matrices: B=P−1AP for an invertible P).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], [L3] and [L6], both matrix carriers are the same function set. The formulas in [L2], [L4] and [L5] agree entry for entry, including empty sums and zero-sized shapes.

L1L2L3L4L5L6
2.1

Since the products and identities agree, the two-sided inverse equations in [L7] and [L8] select the same matrices and the same unique inverses; then the conjugation formulas in [L7] and [L9] select the same similar pairs.

step 1.1L7L8L9∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

28 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources