How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The first-order commutator of an associative deformation is Poisson
Statement
Let be a commutative unital real algebra and let be a formal associative deformation of as in Coefficientwise formal associative deformations. For , define Then is a real Poisson-algebra bracket on . Thus the first-order skew part of an associative deformation necessarily satisfies the Lie and biderivation axioms; this is a necessary compatibility statement, not an existence theorem for a prescribed bracket.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative unital real algebra , a coefficientwise associative unital product on , and its first coefficient .
Coefficientwise formal associative deformations: , and is associative.
General Poisson manifolds from bivector fields: a real Poisson-algebra bracket is bilinear, skew, Jacobi, and a derivation in each argument.
Proof
For any associative product, the commutator satisfies the Jacobi identity. Expanding gives . After reassociating each term, this is ; the two cyclic rotations are and . Their sum is zero by pairwise cancellation.
Associativity also gives the exact derivation identity : expanding both sides and reassociating the four triple products leaves the same expression. Comparing coefficients of gives .
Since , the coefficient of in is exactly . The coefficient of in the commutator Jacobi identity from step 1.1 is . Skew-symmetry of converts this to the Jacobi identity in [F2].
By definition, is real-bilinear and skew-symmetric. The derivation rule in step 1.2 and skew-symmetry give the derivation rule in the first entry; step 2.1 gives Jacobi. These are exactly the Poisson-algebra axioms in [F2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sarah J. Witherspoon, Hochschild Cohomology for Algebras (standard reference, not scraped)
- Maxim Kontsevich, Deformation Quantization of Poisson Manifolds, I (standard reference, not scraped)
- Nima Moshayedi, Lectures on Symplectic Geometry, Poisson Geometry, Deformation Quantization and Quantum Field Theory (standard reference, not scraped)