Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pending
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The first-order commutator of an associative deformation is Poisson

Statement

Let A be a commutative unital real algebra and let ⋆ be a formal associative deformation of A as in Coefficientwise formal associative deformations. For f,g∈A, define β(f,g):=B1(f,g)−B1(g,f). Then β is a real Poisson-algebra bracket on A. Thus the first-order skew part of an associative deformation necessarily satisfies the Lie and biderivation axioms; this is a necessary compatibility statement, not an existence theorem for a prescribed bracket.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A commutative unital real algebra A, a coefficientwise associative unital product ⋆ on A⟦ℏ⟧, and its first coefficient B1.

[F1]

Coefficientwise formal associative deformations: f⋆g=fg+ℏB1(f,g)+ℏ2B2(f,g)+⋯, and ⋆ is associative.

[F2]

General Poisson manifolds from bivector fields: a real Poisson-algebra bracket is bilinear, skew, Jacobi, and a derivation in each argument.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

For any associative product, the commutator [a,b]⋆=a⋆b−b⋆a satisfies the Jacobi identity. Expanding [ [f,g]⋆,k]⋆ gives (f⋆g)⋆k−(g⋆f)⋆k−k⋆(f⋆g)+k⋆(g⋆f). After reassociating each term, this is f⋆g⋆k−g⋆f⋆k−k⋆f⋆g+k⋆g⋆f; the two cyclic rotations are g⋆k⋆f−k⋆g⋆f−f⋆g⋆k+f⋆k⋆g and k⋆f⋆g−f⋆k⋆g−g⋆k⋆f+g⋆f⋆k. Their sum is zero by pairwise cancellation.

1.2givenF1algebra

Associativity also gives the exact derivation identity [f,g⋆k]⋆=[f,g]⋆⋆k+g⋆[f,k]⋆: expanding both sides and reassociating the four triple products leaves the same expression. Comparing coefficients of ℏ gives β(f,gk)=β(f,g)k+gβ(f,k).

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra

Since fg=gf, the coefficient of ℏ in [f,g]⋆ is exactly β(f,g). The coefficient of ℏ2 in the commutator Jacobi identity from step 1.1 is β(β(f,g),k)+β(β(g,k),f)+β(β(k,f),g)=0. Skew-symmetry of β converts this to the Jacobi identity in [F2].

3.1givenF2step 2.1step 1.2algebra∎

By definition, β is real-bilinear and skew-symmetric. The derivation rule in step 1.2 and skew-symmetry give the derivation rule in the first entry; step 2.1 gives Jacobi. These are exactly the Poisson-algebra axioms in [F2].

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources