How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bimodule homotopy equivalences induce natural tensor-functor isomorphisms
Statement
Let and be bounded cochain complexes of graded -bimodules, each term of each complex finite graded projective on the left over and projective as an underlying right -module. Suppose there are internal-degree- zero bimodule chain maps and , and internal-degree-zero bimodule homotopies and of cochain degree such that
Then and induce mutually inverse natural isomorphisms between the tensor functors on
and between the derived tensor functors on ordinary bounded derived categories
and on the corresponding bounded derived categories of graded modules.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The bounded bimodule complexes, the bimodule-linear chain maps , and the bimodule-linear homotopies satisfying the displayed equations. All derived categories use the standing localization size convention from A bounded two-sided projective bimodule complex defines exact derived tensor functors.
Degree-zero bimodule chain maps in both variables induce chain maps on the balanced totalization (Bimodule tensor totalization respects differentials and homotopies).
A homotopy in the first bimodule variable transfers by , and the resulting tensor homotopies give descent to homotopy classes in both variables (Bimodule tensor totalization respects differentials and homotopies).
For each complex satisfying the two-sided projectivity hypotheses, tensor gives a functor from bounded finite graded projectives over to bounded finite graded projectives over (A bounded two-sided projective bimodule complex defines exact derived tensor functors).
For each such complex, tensor preserves quasi-isomorphisms of bounded ordinary and graded inputs and descends to the corresponding derived categories (A bounded two-sided projective bimodule complex defines exact derived tensor functors).
The descended functor in either module setting is the derived tensor functor computed by ordinary signed totalization (A bounded two-sided projective bimodule complex defines exact derived tensor functors).
Proof
Proof technique: tensor the supplied maps and homotopies in the first variable, then check naturality on elementary tensors and pass through the homotopy and derived localizations.
Given: The hypotheses above.
For every bounded graded left -complex , define and . Since and are degree-zero bimodule chain maps, [L1] makes these balanced, internal-degree-zero -linear chain maps.
Transfer to . By [L2], , which is . Transferring gives . These homotopies are natural in , since for every both orders send to , and likewise for . Thus and are mutually inverse natural isomorphisms in the homotopy categories.
For every degree-zero chain map , the composites in the naturality square for both send to ; the same check with proves naturality of . The maps are well defined on homotopy classes by [L2], so these are natural transformations on the bounded homotopy categories.
If has finite graded projective terms, [L3] places both totalizations and both tensor maps in the stated bounded projective homotopy categories. Step 1.2 proves that their composites are the identity morphisms there, so and give inverse natural isomorphisms on .
For bounded ordinary or graded module complexes, [L4] makes both totalization functors preserve quasi-isomorphisms and [L5] identifies their localizations with the derived tensor functors. The natural transformations of Step 2.1 therefore descend through the localizations, and the homotopies of Step 1.2 still make their composites identities. They are mutually inverse natural isomorphisms on both ordinary and graded bounded derived categories.
Empty diagonals and a zero input give zero total complexes, so the formulas remain valid there. For a one-term input, the same first-variable map and homotopy formulas apply; if either supplied homotopy is zero, its equation reduces to a strict inverse equation. Bounded endpoints add only zero components, and the homotopy formulas have no terms outside the given bounded supports. No map or representative is selected: all maps and homotopies are supplied in the hypotheses. The proposition is an implication, not an iff claim. [step 1.1, step 1.2, given, algebra]
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mikhail Khovanov and Paul Seidel, Quivers, Floer Cohomology, and Braid Group Actions, §2c and Proposition 2.4 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stacks Project, Differential Graded Algebra, §22.33, tag 09LP (standard reference, not scraped)