Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The infinitesimal generator of a symplectic action is symplectic

Statement

Assume ACω. Let a smooth left action of G on a symplectic manifold (M,ω) be symplectic. Then every fundamental vector field ξM of the action has vanishing Lie derivative on ω:

LξMω=0.

Consequently each ξM is a symplectic vector field, and the flow of ξM consists of symplectomorphisms.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: ACω, a symplectic action of G on (M,ω) and ξ∈g.

[A1]

ACω is countable choice; it is used only through [F1].

[F1]

ξM(p)=ddt∣0exp⁡G(−tξ)⋅p, and ξM is a smooth vector field. Fundamental vector fields for a left action.

[F2]

The action law is g⋅(h⋅p)=(gh)⋅p and e⋅p=p, and each ag(p)=g⋅p is a diffeomorphism with (ag)∗ω=ω. Smooth left actions of Lie groups, Symplectic and Hamiltonian Lie-group actions.

[F3]

For the local flow Φt of X, LXT=ddt∣0Φt∗T; equivalently, on every common flow domain, Φt∗T=T for all defined t if and only if LXT=0. The Lie derivative of a tensor field, A tensor field is flow-invariant exactly when its Lie derivative vanishes.

[F4]

Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve of a smooth vector field. Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F2given

For fixed p∈M put θ(t)=exp⁡G(−tξ)⋅p. The action law and [F1] give, for every t, θ′(t)=dds∣0exp⁡G(−(t+s)ξ)⋅p=dds∣0exp⁡G(−sξ)⋅(exp⁡G(−tξ)⋅p)=ξM(θ(t)), so θ is an integral curve of ξM with θ(0)=p. Its domain is all of R, because the action and the exponential are defined for all real parameters and all group elements.

2.1F4step 1.1

By [F4] the maximal integral curve of ξM through p is unique, so θ is it; hence the flow of ξM is the global map Φt(p)=exp⁡G(−tξ)⋅p on R×M.

3.1F2step 2.1

For each real t the map Φt=aexp⁡G(−tξ) is the diffeomorphism induced by the group element exp⁡G(−tξ), so [F2] gives Φt∗ω=ω; therefore the curve t↦Φt∗ω is the constant two-form ω on its flow domain.

4.1A1F3step 3.1∎

Differentiating this constant curve at t=0 and applying the flow characterization [F3] with X=ξM and T=ω yields LξMω=0.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources