Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Killing fields restrict to Jacobi fields along geodesics

Statement

Let (M,g) be a smooth Riemannian manifold without boundary, and let X be a smooth vector field with maximal local flow Φ:D→M. For this proposition, call X a Killing field when LXg=0. If I⊆R is a nondegenerate interval and γ:I→M is an affinely parametrized geodesic, then J(t):=Xγ(t) is a Jacobi field along γ. The claim is local along the parameter interval: each compact nondegenerate subinterval is treated on a common flow-time interval, and included endpoints use one-sided derivatives. No completeness assumption is imposed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The boundaryless Riemannian manifold (M,g), the smooth vector field X, its maximal local flow Φ, and the affinely parametrized geodesic γ on the nondegenerate interval I.

[F1]

A local flow has open domain D⊆R×M containing {0}×M (Local and global flows generated by a vector field).

[F2]

It satisfies Φ(0,p)=p, and for each p the time curve s↦Φ(s,p) is an integral curve of X (Local and global flows generated by a vector field).

[F3]

The maximal local flow is the smooth map assembled from the maximal integral curves of X on an open domain (The fundamental theorem on flows).

[F4]

Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve of X (Through each point there is a unique maximal integral curve).

[F5]

The Lie derivative of a smooth tensor field T is the derivative of its pullback along the flow, LXT=dds∣s=0Φs∗T (The Lie derivative of a tensor field).

[F6]

On every common local flow domain, Φs∗T=T for all defined s if and only if LXT=0 (A tensor field is flow-invariant exactly when its Lie derivative vanishes).

[F7]

A local Riemannian isometry is a smooth local diffeomorphism F with F∗h=g (Riemannian isometry and local isometry).

[F8]

A local Riemannian isometry between boundaryless Riemannian manifolds sends every affinely parametrized geodesic to an affinely parametrized geodesic (Local isometries send geodesics to geodesics).

[F9]

A smooth map whose longitudinal curves are affinely parametrized geodesics is a geodesic variation, and its variation field is ∂sF∣s=0 (Geodesic variation).

[F10]

The variation field of a smooth geodesic variation is a Jacobi field (Variation field of a geodesic variation is a Jacobi field).

Proof

technique · differentiate the isometry flow applied to a geodesic
1.1F1F3given

Fix any compact nondegenerate subinterval [a,b]⊆I and put K=γ([a,b]). Since K is compact and the flow domain D is open with {0}×M⊆D by [F1, F3], a finite product-neighborhood cover of {0}×K gives ε>0 and an open neighborhood U⊇K with (−ε,ε)×U⊆D. Set Γ(s,t)=Φ(s,γ(t)) on (−ε,ε)×[a,b]; it is smooth up to the time endpoints. This finite compactness argument makes no countable selection.

2.1F2F3F4step 1.1

Fix ∣s∣<ε and p∈Ds, and set q=Φ(s,p). The translated curve r↦Φ(r+s,p) is an integral curve through q on the shifted interval Dp−s, which contains −s. By maximality and uniqueness of integral curves [F3, F4], −s∈Dq and Φ(−s,q)=p. Reversing s gives the inverse identity on D−s. Since both slices are smooth and their domains are open, Φs:Ds→D−s is a diffeomorphism with inverse Φ−s. Restricting to U makes each Φs a local diffeomorphism.

3.1F5F6F7step 1.1step 2.1given

The hypothesis LXg=0 and [F6] give Φs∗g=g on U for every ∣s∣<ε. Thus each Φs∣U is a local Riemannian isometry by [F7].

4.1F8F9step 1.1step 3.1

For each fixed s, [F8] applied to the local isometry from step 3.1 shows that t↦Φ(s,γ(t)) is an affinely parametrized geodesic. Hence Γ is a geodesic variation by [F9], with variation field V(t)=∂sΓ(0,t).

5.1F2F10step 4.1

The integral-curve property [F2] gives V(t)=∂sΦ(s,γ(t))∣s=0=XΦ(0,γ(t))=Xγ(t)=J(t). The geodesic-variation theorem [F10] therefore makes J Jacobi on [a,b].

6.1F1F10step 1.1step 5.1∎

Since [a,b] was arbitrary, the Jacobi equation holds throughout I, with one-sided derivatives at included endpoints. If γ is constant, every longitudinal curve of Γ is constant in t, so [F10] still applies; if X=0, then J=0. The empty manifold has no supplied geodesic, dimension zero has only the zero field, and dimension one is covered by the same argument. Only finite compactness arguments are used, so neither ACω nor full AC is invoked. The proposition is one-way, not an iff claim.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources