How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Parallel transport under reparametrization reversal and concatenation
Statement
An increasing smooth surjective reparametrization , allowing , leaves endpoint transport unchanged. A decreasing one reverses it. If ends where starts, their concatenation, traversing first, satisfies These assertions include piecewise smooth reparametrizations when the composed curves admit finite smooth subdivisions, as well as inserted constant pauses.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The stated curves and time changes, with the displayed endpoint conditions.
The local derivative is (Local frame formula for covariant differentiation along a curve).
Parallel initial-value sections are unique (Existence and uniqueness of parallel sections).
Reverse transport is the inverse isomorphism (Parallel transport is a linear isomorphism).
Proof
On a smooth frame segment the chain rule gives from the two terms in [F1]. Thus a reparametrized parallel section is parallel even where . Continuity past corners and a common finite refinement give the same result piecewise. By uniqueness, the transported endpoint vector is the value of this section, so increasing endpoint-preserving time changes leave unchanged. A pause has constant section and makes no change.
A decreasing time change exchanges endpoints; the same calculation gives backward transport, which equals the inverse by [F3]. To concatenate, first take the parallel section with input along , then the one with input along . They agree at the joining point, hence give a continuous piecewise parallel section on the concatenation. Uniqueness identifies its endpoint with , proving the composition order. A singleton or constant piece has identity transport; zero-rank fibres have the unique identity map. All refinements and concatenations here have finitely many pieces.
Depends on
Used by
- Path dependent parallel transport on the sphere Counterexample
- Parallel transport depends only on the endpoints of a curve False statement
- Holonomy of a connection Remark
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)