Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Products of complex projective spaces span rational oriented bordism

Statement

Assume AC. For every k≥0 the products PJ=CP2j1×⋯×CP2jr indexed by the partitions J of k form a Q-basis of Ω4kSO⊗Q. Equivalently, Ω∗SO⊗Q is the polynomial algebra over Q on the classes [CP2],[CP4],[CP6],…, and every rational oriented bordism class is a unique rational polynomial in the projective-space classes. Combined with the triangularity lemma this makes the Pontryagin-number matrix of the projective-space products invertible and identifies the dual basis.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer n≥0, the oriented Thom prespectrum Tr=Th⁡(γr+) over Br=BSO(r) with its coordinate-first structure maps αr:S1∧Tr→Tr+1 of The Thom prespectrum of the universal real and oriented bundles, and rational coefficients unless stated.

[F1]

Oriented Grassmannians have two lifted Schubert cells, Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure, Cellular attachments with finite boundary support form a CW complex and The image of a compact space lies in a finite CW subcomplex give Br and the Thom space Tr their CW weak topology: over a lifted d-cell the disk/sphere pair is (Dd×Dr,Dd×Sr−1) and its Thom relative cell is (Dd×Dr)/((∂Dd×Dr)∪(Dd×Sr−1))≅Sd+r, so relative to the basepoint all cells of Tr have dimension at least r.

[F2]

High relative cells do not change lower homotopy applied to the inclusion of the basepoint vertex into Tr gives that Tr is (r−1)-connected; Rational Hurewicz for highly connected CW complexes with c=r and i=n+r then gives an isomorphism πn+r(Tr)⊗Q→Hn+r(Tr;Q) whenever r≤n+r≤2r−2, i.e. r≥n+2.

[F3]

The universal Pontryagin-Thom correspondence for unoriented and oriented bordism identifies ΩnSO≅colim⁡rπn+r(Tr); Rationalization is exact and commutes with singular homology makes −⊗Q exact and compatible with direct sums, so tensoring commutes with the sequential colimit and cofinal tails.

[F4]

Thom isomorphism for oriented vector bundles, Naturality and uniqueness of Thom classes and The Thom quotient identifies relative and reduced cohomology give the oriented Thom isomorphism and its naturality, identifying the cohomology transition map of the prespectrum with ir∗:Hn(Br+1;Q)→Hn(Br;Q) up to the reduced suspension isomorphism; Rational cohomology of BO and BSO by Pontryagin and Euler classes gives the rank-by-rank polynomial presentation, and Naturality, stability, and mod-two reduction of Pontryagin classes the stability of the Pontryagin generators.

[F5]

Cohomology over a field is dual to homology over that field makes evaluation a natural isomorphism for field coefficients; Products of complex projective spaces are linearly independent in rational oriented bordism gives p(k) independent classes in degree 4k; Cartesian product makes bordism a graded ring and Unoriented and oriented bordism groups give the product and the graded ring structure; Zero-dimensional bordism groups gives Ω0SO≅Z with the positively oriented point generator; Products of complex projective spaces have an invertible Pontryagin-number matrix supplies the invertibility of the Pontryagin matrix used in the final identification. The Axiom of Choice is assumed exactly as declared by these suppliers.

Proof

1.1F1F2

The rank-r Thom space is (r−1)-connected. By [F1], Tr is a based CW space whose non-basepoint cells have dimension at least r; applying [F2] to the inclusion of the basepoint gives πi(Tr)=0 for i≤r−1. With c=r and i=n+r the inequalities of [F2] hold exactly when r≥n+2, and in that range the actual rational Hurewicz map πn+r(Tr)⊗Q→Hn+r(Tr;Q) is an isomorphism; since n+r>0, reduced and ordinary homology agree here and no injectivity at the upper endpoint 2r−1 is used.

2.1F2F3step 1.1

Pass to the stable colimit. By the Pontryagin-Thom isomorphism [F3], ΩnSO≅colim⁡rπn+r(Tr). Tensoring with Q commutes with the sequential colimit: presenting the colimit as the cokernel of the shift map on the direct sum, exactness of −⊗Q and its compatibility with direct sums [F3] identify (colim⁡rπn+r(Tr))⊗Q with colim⁡r(πn+r(Tr)⊗Q), and the tail r≥n+2 is cofinal. Naturality of the Hurewicz map with respect to suspension followed by the structure map αr makes the isomorphisms of step 1.1 a map of sequential systems, so ΩnSO⊗Q≅colim⁡r≥n+2Hn+r(Tr;Q).

3.1F4step 2.1

The homology transition maps are isomorphisms. Let ir:Br→Br+1 classify ε+1⊕γr+, the base map of the structure map. The normalized Thom classes and the ordered suspension normalization give the commuting Thom square of [F4], in which the bottom map is identified with ir∗ after the reduced cohomology suspension: Hn(Br+1;Q)≅H~n+r+1(Tr+1;Q)→H~n+r(Tr;Q)≅Hn(Br;Q). Since the degree-n part of the polynomial presentation [F4] uses only the stable Pontryagin generators pj with 4j≤n, which occur in every rank s>n, naturality and stability give that ir∗:Hn(Br+1;Q)→Hn(Br;Q) is an isomorphism for every r≥n+1, in particular throughout the tail.

4.1F5step 2.1step 3.1

Duality and dimension count. By [F5] the evaluation map is a natural isomorphism Hq(Y;Q)≅Hom⁡Q(Hq(Y;Q),Q) for every space. The Thom cohomology and the polynomial presentation show that H~n+r(Tr;Q) is finite-dimensional; hence Hn+r(Tr;Q) is finite-dimensional of the same dimension, since an infinite-dimensional vector space would have an infinite-dimensional dual using a basis and its coordinate functionals. Naturality of evaluation identifies the dual of the homology transition in step 2.1 with the cohomology transition of step 3.1, which is an isomorphism; therefore every homology transition is an isomorphism and the colimit of step 2.1 is any one of its tail groups, giving dim⁡Q(ΩnSO⊗Q)=dim⁡QHn(Br;Q) for r≥n+2.

5.1F4F5step 4.1

Identifying the dimension. If n=4k, the degree-4k monomials in the universal Pontryagin classes are exactly p1a1p2a2⋯ with ∑jaj=k, indexed by the partitions of k; hence the dimension is p(k), the number of partitions of k. If 4∤n no monomial has degree n, so the dimension is zero. For k=0 there is one degree-zero monomial, and [F5] identifies Ω0SO⊗Q≅Q with the positively oriented point.

6.1F5step 5.1∎

Conclusion. For k≥1, [F5] supplies p(k) linearly independent classes [PJ] in degree 4k, and step 5.1 shows the dimension is exactly p(k); hence they form a basis, and the Pontryagin-number matrix on this basis is invertible by the triangularity lemma [F5]. The product theorem for bordism makes xj↦[CP2j] a graded ring map from the polynomial algebra on the classes [CP2j] to Ω∗SO⊗Q; on each degree 4k it carries the monomials to the basis just proved and both sides vanish in degrees not divisible by four, so it is an isomorphism of graded rings, giving uniqueness of the polynomial expression. The empty product in degree zero is the point.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

159 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources