Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rational Hurewicz for highly connected CW complexes

Statement

Assume AC. If a based CW complex X is (c−1)-connected with c≥2, the natural actual rationalized Hurewicz map π_i(X)⊗_Z Q→H_i(X;Q) is an isomorphism for c≤i≤2c−2. Lower positive rational homology vanishes. No finite-type, countability or finite-CW hypothesis is imposed, and no injectivity at 2c−1 is claimed.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; a (c−1)-connected CW complex X with c≥2; for each j a rational basis of Vj=πj(X,v)⊗Q; the CW wedge W of based sphere representatives; and the actual Hurewicz maps hW,hX.

[F1]

Rationalization is exact and every element of πj⊗Q is a fraction with positive denominator, so rescaling a basis by nonzero rational numbers preserves it (Rationalization is exact and commutes with singular homology); the wedge of spheres is (c−1)-connected by the high-relative-cells lemma and its rational homotopy is the direct sum of the sphere groups in the stated range (Rational Hurewicz for arbitrary wedges of high-dimensional spheres, High relative cells do not change lower homotopy).

[F2]

The rational homotopy-isomorphism lemma with the endpoint surjection turns the homotopy comparison into a rational homology comparison (Rational homotopy comparison with one endpoint surjection implies homology comparison); the Hurewicz map on the wedge is an isomorphism in the same range (Rational Hurewicz for arbitrary wedges of high-dimensional spheres).

[F3]

The absolute Hurewicz theorem and its degree-one abelianization identify the low-degree groups (Absolute Hurewicz theorem at the first nonzero degree); basepoint transport along a path is an isomorphism of homotopy groups and the moving-basepoint homotopy leaves the homology pushforward unchanged (Higher homotopy basepoint transport and moving homotopies).

[F4]

AC chooses the numerators, sphere representatives and paths (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F4

For c=2 there is just i=2, so integral first Hurewicz and the rationalization lemma prove the theorem. Assume c≥3 and put D=2c−2. Choose a vertex v∈X as basepoint. For each j=c,...,D+1, choose a rational basis of V_j=π_j(X,v)⊗Q. Every basis vector is a fraction a/s by the rationalization lemma, with a∈π_j(X,v) and positive integer s. For each vector choose such a numerator and a based sphere map representing it. Replacing each basis vector by its numerator only rescales that vector by a nonzero rational number, so the chosen numerators still form a basis. AC makes these simultaneous choices for set-sized families.

2.1step 1.1F1F2

Let W be the CW wedge of all these spheres, and define f:W→X by the chosen representatives. The wedge weak topology makes f continuous, because its restriction to every sphere is continuous and the maps agree at the vertex. Both W and X are 2-connected; W has no positive cells below c, and the high-relative-cells lemma applied to (W,{vertex}) supplies that connectivity. The wedge Hurewicz lemma shows that, for i≤D, the rational π_i(W) consists exactly of the independent sphere generators in dimension i. Their images are the chosen basis of V_i. Below c both groups are zero. Thus π_i(f)⊗Q is an isomorphism for 2≤i≤D. In degree D+1 no decomposition of the full wedge homotopy group is asserted: the sphere generators chosen in that degree already span V_{D+1}, so π_{D+1}(f)⊗Q is surjective.

3.1step 2.1F2

The rational homotopy-to-homology comparison gives H_i(f;Q) an isomorphism through D. By the wedge Hurewicz lemma the Hurewicz map on W is an isomorphism in that same range. For each c≤i≤D the naturality square π_i(W)⊗Q --π_i(f)⊗Q--> π_i(X)⊗Q | h_W | h_X v v H_i(W;Q) ----H_i(f;Q)----> H_i(X;Q) commutes. The left, upper and lower arrows are isomorphisms, so h_X is an isomorphism. This proves the specified map, not merely equality of dimensions of two vector spaces.

4.1step 3.1F3F4∎

For a different basepoint x∈X choose a path from v to x. Published basepoint transport is an isomorphism, and the moving-basepoint homotopy of its sphere representative leaves its singular homology pushforward unchanged. Hence the same statement holds at every basepoint and has the usual naturality under based continuous maps. Connectivity and first integral Hurewicz give lower homology vanishing. The empty space is excluded by connectivity; a point and zero rational homotopy groups give empty sphere families and are included. The argument never identifies an infinite-dimensional space with its double dual, interchanges an infinite spectral-sequence limit, or assumes finite generation of any homotopy group. The finite range ends at D=2c−2 throughout.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

71 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources