Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Stable Thom cohomology is a square-module coalgebra

Statement

Assume AC. For a∈A and m∈M, the stable Steenrod action and Whitney-sum coproduct satisfy Δ_M(a·m)=Δ_A(a)·Δ_M(m), where A acts diagonally on M⊗M. The counit is compatible with the action, so M is an A-module coalgebra.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: AC; the stable Thom cohomology module M=H^∗(TO;F2) with its Whitney-sum coproduct ΔM from Whitney-sum coalgebra on stable unoriented Thom cohomology; the connected bialgebra A of square operations with coproduct ΔA; and the componentwise stable square action of Stable Steenrod squares on universal Thom cohomology.

[F1]

The Whitney-sum coproduct is induced by the finite-rank direct-sum Thom pullbacks, and the stable-square lemma gives the componentwise action with the compatibility identities (Whitney sum defines the connected coalgebra on stable Thom cohomology, Stable Steenrod squares on universal Thom cohomology, Whitney-sum coalgebra on stable unoriented Thom cohomology).

[F2]

Squares are natural and satisfy the Cartan formula, so on external products they split as sums of componentwise squares; the bialgebra coproduct of the square algebra is ΔA(Sqk)=∑i+j=kSqi⊗Sqj (Steenrod squares are well-defined and natural, Cartan formula for Steenrod squares, The admissible square algebra is a connected bialgebra).

[F3]

The bialgebra coproduct is multiplicative and unital, so the tensor action respects composition and the unit; positive-degree action raises degree, while degree-zero action is scalar. These elementary checks give the diagonal action and counit identities below; AC fixes the module presentational choices (The Axiom of Choice).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2

For x∈M, take its sufficiently high finite-rank components x_n. The Whitney coalgebra is induced by the finite-rank direct-sum Thom pullback μ*, so naturality gives Δ_M(Sq^k x)=μ*(Sq^k x)=Sq^k(μ* x). Write μ*x under the Künneth isomorphism as a finite sum Σx_a⊗y_b. Cartan gives Sqk(xa×yb)=∑i+j=kSqi(xa)×Sqj(yb).

2.1step 1.1F2F3∎

Therefore Δ_M(Sq^k x)=Σ_{i+j=k}(Sq^i⊗Sq^j)Δ_M(x) =Sq^k·Δ_M(x), where the last action is the diagonal A-action defined from Δ_A(Sq^k). This is the required compatibility for the generators. For a product ab∈A, Δ_A(ab)=Δ_A(a)Δ_A(b); the module law on M and the already-verified generator compatibility give Δ_M((ab)x)=(ab)·Δ_M(x). Extend by linearity to all a∈A. The diagonal action is unital because ΔA(1)=1⊗1; its composition law follows by expanding ΔA(ab)=ΔA(a)ΔA(b) and using the action law in each factor. For homogeneous a,m, εM(am)=εA(a)εM(m): both sides vanish if either degree is positive, and in total degree zero this is the scalar-action identity. Linearity gives the same conclusion for all inputs. Thus all hypotheses involving the action and coproduct are satisfied.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

48 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources