Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coset equality, well-defined quotient operations, and the canonical projection with kernel W

Statement

Let V be a vector space over F and let WV. For v,vV the cosets of The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection satisfy v+W=v+Wexactly whenvvW. The operations on V/W in The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection are independent of the chosen representatives and make V/W a vector space over F. The canonical projection π:VV/W is a surjective linear map and kerπ=W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A vector space V over F, a linear subspace WV, and the cosets and operations displayed in The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection.

[L1]

For vV the coset of W represented by v is v+W:={v+w:wW}, and the proposed operations are (v+W)+(u+W):=(v+u)+W and a(v+W):=(av)+W (The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection).

[L2]

A linear subspace W of V satisfies (W1) 0VW, (W2) u,vW implies u+vW, and (W3) λF and vW imply λvW (Linear subspace of a vector space).

[L3]

A map is linear when it preserves all linear combinations: T(au+bv)=aT(u)+bT(v) (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Suppose v+W=v+W. By (W1) of [L2] we have v=v+0Vv+W, so vv+W, giving wW with v=v+w and hence vv=wW. Conversely suppose vvW. For wW, v+w=v+((vv)+w) and (vv)+wW by (W2), so v+Wv+W; since vv=(1)(vv)W by (W3), the same argument gives v+Wv+W. Hence v+W=v+W exactly when vvW.

L1L2
2.1

Let v+W=v+W and u+W=u+W. By step 1.1, vvW and uuW, so (v+u)(v+u)=(vv)+(uu)W by (W2) and avav=a(vv)W by (W3). Applying step 1.1 in the converse direction gives (v+u)+W=(v+u)+W and (av)+W=(av)+W, so both quotient operations are independent of representatives.

step 1.1L1L2
3.1

The vector-space identities in V/W follow by applying the corresponding identities in V to representatives, with zero coset W=0V+W and inverse (v+W)=(v)+W; moreover π(av+bu)=(av+bu)+W=aπ(v)+bπ(u) by [L1] and [L3], every coset is π(v) by definition, and by step 1.1 π(v)=0V+W exactly when v0V=vW, so π is linear and surjective with kerπ=W.

step 1.1step 2.1L1L3

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 16 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources