How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Coset equality, well-defined quotient operations, and the canonical projection with kernel
Statement
Let be a vector space over and let . For the cosets of The quotient vector space and its canonical projection satisfy The operations on in The quotient vector space and its canonical projection are independent of the chosen representatives and make a vector space over . The canonical projection is a surjective linear map and
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A vector space over , a linear subspace , and the cosets and operations displayed in The quotient vector space and its canonical projection.
For the coset of represented by is , and the proposed operations are and (The quotient vector space and its canonical projection).
A linear subspace of satisfies (W1) , (W2) implies , and (W3) and imply (Linear subspace of a vector space).
A map is linear when it preserves all linear combinations: (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).
Proof
Suppose . By (W1) of [L2] we have , so , giving with and hence . Conversely suppose . For , and by (W2), so ; since by (W3), the same argument gives . Hence exactly when .
Let and . By step 1.1, and , so by (W2) and by (W3). Applying step 1.1 in the converse direction gives and , so both quotient operations are independent of representatives.
The vector-space identities in follow by applying the corresponding identities in to representatives, with zero coset and inverse ; moreover by [L1] and [L3], every coset is by definition, and by step 1.1 exactly when , so is linear and surjective with .
Depends on
Used by
- The quotient of F³ by a coordinate line and its canonical projection Example
- A quotient basis lifts to a basis adapted to W Lemma
- Invariance makes the induced quotient operator well defined and linear, with π T=bar Tπ Proposition
- Universal property of the quotient vector space Theorem
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 16 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., Results 3.101-3.104 (standard reference, not scraped)