Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Coset equality, well-defined quotient operations, and the canonical projection with kernel W

Statement

Let V be a vector space over F and let W≤V. For v,v′∈V the cosets of The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection satisfy v+W=v′+Wexactly whenv−v′∈W. The operations on V/W in The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection are independent of the chosen representatives and make V/W a vector space over F. The canonical projection π:V→V/W is a surjective linear map and ker⁡π=W.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A vector space V over F, a linear subspace W≤V, and the cosets and operations displayed in The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection.

[L1]

For v∈V the coset of W represented by v is v+W:={v+w:w∈W}, and the proposed operations are (v+W)+(u+W):=(v+u)+W and a(v+W):=(av)+W (The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection).

[L2]

A linear subspace W of V satisfies (W1) 0V∈W, (W2) u,v∈W implies u+v∈W, and (W3) λ∈F and v∈W imply λv∈W (Linear subspace of a vector space).

[L3]

A map is linear when it preserves all linear combinations: T(au+bv)=aT(u)+bT(v) (Linear map between vector spaces over the same field).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2

Suppose v+W=v′+W. By (W1) of [L2] we have v=v+0V∈v+W, so v∈v′+W, giving w∈W with v=v′+w and hence v−v′=w∈W. Conversely suppose v−v′∈W. For w∈W, v+w=v′+((v−v′)+w) and (v−v′)+w∈W by (W2), so v+W⊆v′+W; since v′−v=(−1)(v−v′)∈W by (W3), the same argument gives v′+W⊆v+W. Hence v+W=v′+W exactly when v−v′∈W.

2.1step 1.1L1L2

Let v+W=v′+W and u+W=u′+W. By step 1.1, v−v′∈W and u−u′∈W, so (v+u)−(v′+u′)=(v−v′)+(u−u′)∈W by (W2) and av−av′=a(v−v′)∈W by (W3). Applying step 1.1 in the converse direction gives (v+u)+W=(v′+u′)+W and (av)+W=(av′)+W, so both quotient operations are independent of representatives.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L1L3∎

The vector-space identities in V/W follow by applying the corresponding identities in V to representatives, with zero coset W=0V+W and inverse −(v+W)=(−v)+W; moreover π(av+bu)=(av+bu)+W=aπ(v)+bπ(u) by [L1] and [L3], every coset is π(v) by definition, and by step 1.1 π(v)=0V+W exactly when v−0V=v∈W, so π is linear and surjective with ker⁡π=W.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The quotient vector space V/W and its canonical projection.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources