Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Heisenberg group of order p3 is extraspecial, and for odd p it has exponent p

Statement

Let p be a prime and let Hp be the Heisenberg group of order p3. Then

Z(Hp)=[Hp,Hp]={(0,0,c):cZ/p},

a subgroup of order p, and Hp is extraspecial. For odd p the exponent of Hp is p. At p=2 the exponent is 4, since (1,1,0)2=(0,0,1).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A prime p and the Heisenberg group Hp.

[F1]

The Heisenberg group of order p3 is the set Hp={(a,b,c):a,b,cZ/p} with (a,b,c)(a,b,c):=(a+a,b+b,c+c+ab) (The Heisenberg group of order p3 over Z/p).

[F2]

Z(G):={zG:zg=gz for every gG} (The center Z(G) of a group).

[F3]

For g,hG the commutator is [g,h]:=ghg1h1, and [G,G] is the subgroup generated by all commutators (Commutators [g,h]=ghg1h1 and the commutator subgroup [G,G]).

[F4]

For a finite group G, exp(G)=min{nN:n>0 and gn=e for every gG} (The exponent of a finite group).

[L1]

The Heisenberg multiplication is a group law with identity (0,0,0) and inverse (a,b,c)1=(a,b,c+ab); the group is not abelian, Hp=p3, and (1,0,0)a=(a,0,0), (0,1,0)b=(0,b,0), (0,0,1)c=(0,0,c) (The Heisenberg multiplication is a group law, nonabelian, on a set of p3 elements).

[L2]

For a finite p-group P the following are equivalent: P is extraspecial; P is nonabelian, Z(P)=p and P/Z(P) is elementary abelian; P is nonabelian and Z(P)=P=Φ(P) has order p (Three equivalent descriptions of an extraspecial p-group).

[L3]

For NG, the quotient G/N is abelian if and only if [G,G]N (G/N is abelian if and only if [G,G]N).

[L4]

If the quotient group G/Z(G) is cyclic, then G is abelian (If G/Z(G) is cyclic, then G is abelian).

[L5]

For a finite group G and HG, G=[G:H]H (Lagrange's theorem: G=[G:H]H for every subgroup H of a finite group G).

[L6]

An elementary abelian p-group is a finite abelian p-group in which every nonidentity element has order p (Elementary abelian p-groups).

[L7]

For an odd prime p and a finite group G with [G,G]Z(G) of exponent dividing p, (xy)p=xpyp for all x,y (For an odd prime p, the p-th power map is a homomorphism on a finite group whose derived subgroup is central of exponent dividing p).

[L9]

A finite p-group is a finite group whose order has the form pn (A finite p-group has order pn for a prime p and some nN).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A triple (a,b,c) commutes with (a,b,c) exactly when ab=ab. Taking (a,b,c)=(0,1,0) gives a=0, and taking (a,b,c)=(1,0,0) gives b=0; conversely every (0,0,c) commutes with everything. So Z(Hp)={(0,0,c)}, a subgroup of order p.

F1F2L1
1.2

For g=(a,b,c) and h=(a,b,c) one has gh=(a+a,b+b,c+c+ab) and hg=(a+a,b+b,c+c+ab), so gh=hg(0,0,abab) and therefore [g,h]=(gh)(hg)1=(0,0,abab).

F1F3L1
1.3

Hp is a finite p-group of order p3 and is not abelian.

L1L9
2.1

Every commutator lies in {(0,0,t)}, and taking a=b=1 with a=b=0 gives the commutator (0,0,1), which generates that subgroup; hence [Hp,Hp]=Z(Hp), of order p.

F3L8step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

By Lagrange the quotient Hp/Z(Hp) has order p2; it is abelian because [Hp,Hp]Z(Hp), and it is not cyclic, since a cyclic central quotient would make Hp abelian. An abelian group of order p2 that is not cyclic has no element of order p2, so every one of its nonidentity elements has order p and it is elementary abelian.

L3L4L5L6step 2.1step 1.3
4.1

By the second description in the characterisation, Hp is extraspecial.

L2step 1.1step 1.3step 3.1
5.1

For odd p, the derived subgroup is central of order p, so the p-th power map is a homomorphism; the three generators (1,0,0), (0,1,0) and (0,0,1) have p-th power the identity, so the p-th power map is trivial on a generating set and hence on Hp. Since Hp is nontrivial, its exponent is p.

F4L1L7L8step 2.1step 4.1
6.1

At p=2 the exponent is not 2: (1,1,0)2=(1+1,1+1,0+0+11)=(0,0,1), which is not the identity, while (0,0,1)2=(0,0,0), so (1,1,0) has order 4 and the exponent is 4.

F1F4L1L5step 1.3

Remarks

The group is extraspecial at every prime, p=2 included; only the exponent depends on the parity of p. The step that fails at p=2 is the p-th power homomorphism, whose hypothesis is that p be odd, and the failure is visible in the element (1,1,0) of order four.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

59 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources