Alphabeta Math
PropositionStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-06
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Degree-zero Tor is the tensor product in either construction

Statement

For a right R-module N and a left R-module M, both resolution constructions give Tor0R(N,M)NRM.

Proof

Given: a projective resolution PM and a projective resolution QN.

1.1

The augmented complex P1P0M0 remains right exact after NR, so H0(NRP)=coker(NP1NP0).

given
2.1

That cokernel is NRM by the displayed right-exact sequence, so the left-resolved construction has the asserted degree-zero value.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

The same calculation for QRM gives coker(Q1MQ0M)=NRM, proving both identifications.

step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources