Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-generatedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-31 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

Preservation ledger for the separation axioms, with T1T_1 conventions kept explicit

Remarks

T0T_0, T1T_1, Hausdorffness, regularity, T3T_3, complete regularity, and Tychonoffness pass both to subspaces and to arbitrary products by T0T_0, T1T_1, T2T_2, regularity, T3T_3, complete regularity, and Tychonoffness are hereditary and T0T_0, T1T_1, T2T_2, regularity, T3T_3, complete regularity, and Tychonoffness are productive. The compound names retain their T1T_1 clauses: T3T_3 and Tychonoff are not alternative names for regularity and complete regularity.

Normality has a narrower positive result: it passes to closed subspaces by Every closed subspace of a normal space is normal. Complete normality is exactly hereditary normality by A space is completely normal if and only if every subspace is normal. Under countable choice the deleted Tychonoff plank refutes hereditary normality (Assuming countable choice, normality is not hereditary, even to open regular subspaces); under choice the lower-limit plane refutes productive normality (Assuming choice, normality is not productive: the normal lower-limit line has a nonnormal square). These failures do not alter the positive ledger above.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 116 results over 16 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources