How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Vanishing primary and characteristic obstructions do not classify embeddings
Remark
Assume AC for the characteristic-class clauses (The Axiom of Choice). Every embedding is an immersion with empty double point set (Smooth embeddings, Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps), so, in the -into- setting of The primary double point obstruction to removing self-intersections, its defined primary counts vanish and its selected-pair conditions are vacuous; and its normal bundle satisfies the usual rank restrictions on characteristic classes. A rank- real bundle has for and for ; the cohomological degree of need not be at most (Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation, Pontryagin classes by complexification). Nevertheless these vanishings do not classify embeddings up to isotopy, and Smale–Hirsch theory for immersions must not be applied to embeddings without additional knotting data.
A proved witness consists of the standard and reflected parametrized embeddings in The round circle and its reflection are not isotopic embeddings in the plane. Both have empty double point sets and trivial normal line bundles, hence zero primary unoriented double point count and identical stable characteristic classes, but they are not isotopic. The primary count is within the definition’s -into- setting with , and is zero because the double point set is empty. Every selected-pair Whitney-circle condition is vacuous. The integral count is not invoked, since is odd. This witness shows that these primary and characteristic data do not classify embeddings in general. It does not assert that every characteristic class vanishes for every embedding, or that no restricted embedding problem can be classified by such data.
Consequently the disjunction statement of Whitney disjunction removes algebraically cancelling double points is a statement about regularly homotoping a self-transverse immersion, not about isotoping embeddings, and The isotopy extension theorem converts isotopies of embeddings into ambient isotopies only for families that are already given. The cancellation criterion concerns the finite branch-pair count and admissible Whitney circles, with self-transverse endpoints. In the simply connected oriented even-dimensional stable range it supplies a regular homotopy to an embedding after first separating triple images; it does not supply an isotopy between two given embeddings.
Depends on
- The round circle and its reflection are not isotopic embeddings in the plane
- Pontryagin classes by complexification
- Stiefel–Whitney classes from the projective-bundle relation
- The Axiom of Choice
- The primary double point obstruction to removing self-intersections
- Whitney disjunction removes algebraically cancelling double points
- Smooth embeddings
- Regular homotopy of immersions
- Immersions, submersions, and constant-rank maps
- The isotopy extension theorem
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
67 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Arkadiy Skopenkov, Embedding and Knotting of Manifolds in Euclidean Spaces (arXiv:math/0604045), §1, article pp. 2–5 (self-intersection set; ambient versus non-ambient isotopy) and §2, article pp. 6–14 (Theorems 2.1–2.3 and 2.8; the modulo 2 and integral Whitney obstruction; the Whitney invariant); §3 and §5 used only for the recorded knotting boundary (standard reference, not scraped)
- C. T. C. Wall, Differential Topology (Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics 156, Cambridge University Press 2016; full text retrieved from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine snapshot of the ETH Zürich course copy), Chapter 6 §§6.2–6.4, printed pp. 169–192 (Theorem 6.2.1; Propositions 6.3.1 and 6.3.3; Theorems 6.3.2, 6.3.4, 6.3.6, 6.4.5, 6.4.8 and 6.4.9; Lemma 6.3.5) (standard reference, not scraped)