Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A right module is flat exactly when Tor one against every left module vanishes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and supplied projective-resolution data. A right R-module N is flat if and only if Tor1R(N,M)=0 for every left R-module M.

Proof

Given: a right module N and an arbitrary left module M.

1.1

If N is flat, tensor a full projective resolution of M with N. Exactness of NR preserves the augmented resolution, so its positive homology, and in particular Tor1(N,M) by The balanced Tor bifunctor, vanishes.

given
1.2

If ABC0 is exact in left modules, Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups identifies NRC with (NRB)/im(NRA): balanced maps annihilating the image are precisely those that descend to N×C. Thus NR is right exact over the arbitrary ring R. Applied to a resolution P1P0X0, this gives H0(NRP)NRX. This is natural under comparison maps because augmentations commute with them. By The balanced Tor bifunctor, it is the natural identification Tor0R(N,X)NRX.

givenalgebra
2.1

Conversely, for an inclusion KP of left modules, apply The long exact Tor sequence in the left-module variable to 0KPP/K0. Exactness identifies the kernel of NKNP with the image of Tor1(N,P/K).

step 1.2algebra
3.1

Universal vanishing gives injectivity for every such inclusion, and right exactness supplies the rest; thus NR is exact.

step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources