Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-06 rests on unproved material (inherited)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Rests on 3 statements not proved in this library, by way of the results it cites. This item cites no such statement directly; it depends on results that do. The unproved premises it inherits are Cohen's first model: an infinite Dedekind-finite set of reals, Sierpiński 1947: the generalised continuum hypothesis implies the Axiom of Choice and The continuum hypothesis and its generalisation are independent of ZFC. Each is recorded with a citation to the literature and is not established here, because the track that would prove it has not yet been developed in this library. Everything else in this proof is proved here.

A left module is flat exactly when Tor one against every right module vanishes

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and supplied projective-resolution data. A left R-module M is flat if and only if Tor1R(N,M)=0 for every right R-module N.

Proof

Given: a left module M and an arbitrary right module N.

1.1

If M is flat, tensor a full projective resolution QN with M. Exactness of RM preserves its augmented exactness, so Hi(QRM)=0 for every i>0. The right-resolution definition and The balanced Tor bifunctor give Tor1R(N,M)=0.

given
1.2

For right modules ABC0, the universal property Universal property of the tensor product for balanced maps into abelian groups gives CRM(BRM)/im(ARM): a balanced map on B×M kills that image exactly when it factors through C×M. Thus tensoring is right exact over the arbitrary ring R. In particular H0(QRM)NRM, naturally under augmentation-preserving maps.

givenalgebra
2.1

Conversely, let KP be an inclusion of right modules. Apply the projective horseshoe construction to 0KPP/K0, tensor its degreewise split resolution sequence with M, and take the long exact homology sequence. Its degree-zero boundary identifies the kernel of KMPM with the image of Tor1(P/K,M).

step 1.2algebra
3.1

The assumed vanishing makes every such tensor map injective; together with right exactness this gives exactness on all short exact sequences, hence flatness.

step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources