How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flat dimension at most n is equivalent to the prescribed higher Tor vanishing
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Dependent Choice and supplied projective-resolution data. For a left -module and , if and only if for every right module and every .
Proof
Given: the definition of flat dimension and arbitrary right modules .
If is flat, the Tor-one criterion gives for every right , and dimension shifting in a projective resolution of gives for all .
Suppose is a flat resolution of length . Break it into short exact sequences of successive kernels. The long exact Tor sequence and step 1.1 shift every with to a positive Tor group of , hence to zero.
Conversely, take a projective resolution and put and for , with . Repeated dimension shifting identifies with ; for this is the identity. The assumed vanishing makes flat by the Tor-one criterion. Truncating at gives a length- flat resolution, including the case .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
14 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles A. Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)