How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every defines a bounded linear functional on
Statement
Let be a measure space, let , and let be conjugate to . For each , the formula defines a bounded linear functional on , and In particular,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure space , an exponent , its conjugate exponent , an element , and an element .
Elements of are almost-everywhere equivalence classes of measurable representatives (The space as the quotient by null functions).
Holder's inequality gives for measurable representatives and when both exponents are finite, with the corresponding -- representative form at the endpoint (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
Two integrable functions have the same integral whenever they are equal almost everywhere (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).
The Lebesgue integral is linear on (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
Proof
Choose measurable representatives of and of . Then ; if then , while if then is an essentially bounded representative. Thus [L2] gives and
If is another representative of , then almost everywhere. Hence almost everywhere. Since both products are integrable by step 1.1, [L3] gives so is well defined on the class .
If is another representative of , then almost everywhere. Hence almost everywhere. Since both products are integrable by step 1.1, [L3] gives so is independent of the chosen representative of .
Let and let . Choose representatives . By step 2.1 we may compute with representatives, and [L4] gives The estimate from step 1.1 also shows so is linear and bounded.
The estimate in step 3.1 holds for every with . Taking the supremum over the unit ball gives Thus is a bounded linear functional on .
Depends on
- A bounded linear functional on $L^p(\mu)$ and its operator norm
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree
- Elements of $L^p$ are equivalence classes, so pointwise statements require a representative
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Theorem 6.15 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Richard F. Bass, Real Analysis for Graduate Students, Proposition 15.10 (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory, Proposition 7.13 (standard reference, not scraped)