Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Every g∈Lq(μ) defines a bounded linear functional on Lp(μ)

Statement

Let (X,A,μ) be a measure space, let 1≤p<∞, and let q be conjugate to p. For each g∈Lq(μ), the formula Λg([f]):=∫fg dμ defines a bounded linear functional on Lp(μ), and ∣Λg([f])∣≤∥[f]∥p∥g∥q([f]∈Lp(μ)). In particular, ∥Λg∥≤∥g∥q.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A measure space (X,A,μ), an exponent 1≤p<∞, its conjugate exponent q, an element g∈Lq(μ), and an element [f]∈Lp(μ).

[L1]

Elements of Lp(μ) are almost-everywhere equivalence classes of measurable representatives (The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions).

[L2]

Holder's inequality gives ∫∣uv∣ dμ≤∥u∥p∥v∥q for measurable representatives u∈Lp(μ) and v∈Lq(μ) when both exponents are finite, with the corresponding L1--L∞ representative form at the endpoint (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[L3]

Two integrable functions have the same integral whenever they are equal almost everywhere (Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree).

[L4]

The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ) (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

Proof

technique · Use Holder to make the pairing integrable, then use almost-everywhere invariance of the integral to descend from representatives to $L^p$ classes
1.1L1L2given

Choose measurable representatives u of [f] and v of g. Then u∈Lp(μ); if q<∞ then v∈Lq(μ), while if q=∞ then v is an essentially bounded representative. Thus [L2] gives uv∈L1(μ) and ∣∫uv dμ∣≤∥u∥p∥v∥q=∥[f]∥p∥g∥q.

2.1L1L3step 1.1

If u′ is another representative of [f], then u=u′ almost everywhere. Hence uv=u′v almost everywhere. Since both products are integrable by step 1.1, [L3] gives ∫uv dμ=∫u′v dμ, so Λg([f]) is well defined on the class [f].

2.2L1L3step 1.1

If v′ is another representative of g, then v=v′ almost everywhere. Hence uv=uv′ almost everywhere. Since both products are integrable by step 1.1, [L3] gives ∫uv dμ=∫uv′ dμ, so Λg([f]) is independent of the chosen representative of g.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1step 2.2L4given

Let [f],[h]∈Lp(μ) and let a,b∈C. Choose representatives u,w. By step 2.1 we may compute with representatives, and complex linearity in [L4] gives Λg(a[f]+b[h])=∫(au+bw)v dμ=a∫uv dμ+b∫wv dμ=aΛg([f])+bΛg([h]). The estimate from step 1.1 also shows ∣Λg([f])∣≤∥[f]∥p∥g∥q, so Λg is complex linear and bounded.

4.1step 3.1given∎

The estimate in step 3.1 holds for every [f] with ∥[f]∥p≤1. Taking the supremum over the unit ball gives ∥Λg∥≤∥g∥q. Thus Λg is a bounded linear functional on Lp(μ).

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources