Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

If VV has a basis with nn elements and a basis with mm elements then n=mn = m; and if VV has one finite basis then every basis of VV is finite

Statement

Let VV be a vector space over a field FF (Vector space over a field).

  1. If BB and BB' are bases of VV (Basis of a vector space: a linearly independent spanning subset; and ordered basis: an injective finite list whose image is a basis) with BnB \approx n and BmB' \approx m for n,mNn, m \in \mathbb{N} (Equinumerous sets, ABA \approx B and ABA \preceq B), then n=mn = m.
  2. If VV has one finite basis (Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable), then every basis of VV is finite.

The infinite case is not claimed. Nothing here asserts that any two infinite bases of a space are equinumerous. The Steinitz argument gives invariance only when one of the bases is finite; the infinite case rests on cardinal arithmetic, which is not available at this point in the reading order, cardinal numbers being developed much later in the library. What replaces it here is the honest substitute on the companion page: a proper linear subspace with a basis equinumerous with a basis of the whole space, which compares two specific infinite bases through an explicit bijection and assigns no dimension to either space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A field FF and a vector space VV over FF.

[L4]

\le on N\mathbb{N} is a total order, in particular antisymmetric (\le is a linear order on N\mathbb{N}, Order on the natural numbers, The natural numbers N\mathbb{N} (von Neumann)).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let BnB \approx n and BmB' \approx m be bases of VV. Then BB spans VV and is finite of size nn, while BB' is linearly independent, so BB' is finite and the unique qq with BqB' \approx q satisfies qnq \le n. Since BmB' \approx m as well, uniqueness gives q=mq = m, so mnm \le n.

L1L2L3
1.2

Exchanging the roles of the two bases, BB' spans VV and is finite of size mm while BB is linearly independent, so the unique qq' with BqB \approx q' satisfies qmq' \le m; and BnB \approx n gives q=nq' = n, so nmn \le m.

L1L2L3
1.3

Claim 2. Let BB be a finite basis of VV, say BpB \approx p, and let BB' be any basis of VV. Then BB spans VV and is finite of size pp, while BB' is linearly independent, so BB' is finite.

L1L2
2.1

Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give mnm \le n and nmn \le m, so n=mn = m by antisymmetry, which is claim 1; and claim 2 is step 1.3.

step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3L4

Remarks

  • This is the well-definedness obligation for Finite-dimensional vector space, and its dimension dimFV\dim_F V; infinite-dimensional means having no finite basis. Without claim 1 the phrase "the dimension of VV" would name nothing, since a space with a basis of nn elements might also have one of mnm \ne n elements. Claim 2 is the companion statement that finiteness of some basis is a property of the space and not of the chosen basis.

  • Both halves come from one corollary, used twice. The only input is that an independent set cannot outnumber a finite spanning set; applying it in each direction gives the two inequalities, and antisymmetry of the order on N\mathbb{N} closes the argument. Nothing here re-runs the exchange.

  • What "not available at this point in the reading order" means. The infinite invariance statement is a genuine theorem of set theory and algebra, and it is not being denied. It is simply not derivable from anything the library has established so far, since its standard proof compares cardinals; the page states what it can prove and marks the boundary rather than gesturing past it.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 70 results over 26 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources