How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
BIC fitted-value risk bound
Statement
Let , let be fixed, and let have a nonempty support of size . Suppose , where is centered sub-Gaussian with proxy in the linear-functional sense of Sub-Gaussian variables and vectors, and sub-exponential variables. Run Penalized support-search least squares with
For every admissible input to Penalized support-search least squares, its finite scan terminates and returns a support minimizing over all supports. Among tied minimizers, it returns the earliest support in the prescribed order.
Moreover, there is a universal constant such that, for every ,
Since , this also gives . The theorem makes no design-rank, incoherence, or column-normalization assumption. It asserts no zero right-hand side when .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: For the scan assertion, any admissible input listed in the Definition of Penalized support-search least squares. For the risk bound, the fixed-design model, centered sub-Gaussian noise, nonempty true support of size , and .
The support list consists of every subset of the finite -element coordinate set, so it is finite and nonempty by for finite . The algorithm lists it in the prescribed order and updates its incumbent only when it finds a strictly smaller score (Penalized support-search least squares).
For centered sub-Gaussian noise with proxy and a fixed subspace of rank , ; proxy zero gives zero projection error (Sub-Gaussian projection risk bounds).
For natural with , (A binomial support-count bound).
Orthogonal projection is the nearest-point map on its subspace (The orthogonal projection is the unique nearest point in the subspace).
The Euclidean inner product satisfies Cauchy--Schwarz (The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for finite sums).
The centered vector MGF convention is the all-directions bound (Sub-Gaussian variables and vectors, and sub-exponential variables).
Orthogonal projection has its component in the subspace and its residual orthogonal to that subspace (The orthogonal projection is the -component in ).
Probability is countably subadditive (Basic identities for a probability measure).
The nonnegative squared fitted-value error is the loss used here; risk is its expectation (Loss functions and risk).
The selected support index and fitted-vector maps are Borel measurable for this finite score family (Finite tie-broken projection searches are Borel measurable).
The natural logarithm is the inverse of , is strictly increasing, has the product law and , and (The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function, Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm, The real exponential function and the number by a power series).
Proof
Let be the finite ordered support list from [F1]. After the first support is processed, the incumbent has least score and earliest index among minimizers in the first one-element list. If this is true after supports, then the next score either is strictly smaller, in which case replacing the incumbent gives the new least score, or is at least the incumbent score, in which case retaining it preserves the minimum and keeps the earlier index in a tie. Induction proves the invariant through , so the scan terminates and returns the least-scoring support with the stated tie rule.
Let be the selected support, , , and . The support is a candidate, and . By step 1.1 and [F4], the selected penalized score is no larger than the score of the projection onto , whose residual is no larger than . Thus Expanding gives .
On the event , set . Then , whose dimension is at most . Young's inequality applied to and yields If , no tail event with a positive threshold can occur.
Assume and fix . First consider . On the event , step 3.1 implies for a unit vector in . By [F6] and [F8], this forces . Since , [F2] gives, for ,
Now fix and a candidate support of size . On the event , step 3.1 forces for a unit vector in , whose dimension is at most . By [F6] and [F8], this implies . By [F2], the probability for this support is at most
Union bound over the supports, use [F3], and substitute the specified . Since , the sum over all is at most The last inequality follows because each summand is at most , there are terms, and by [F5].
Take in steps 4.1 and 6.1. Each branch has probability at most , so with probability at least , By [F5, F12], because , , and . Since , the right side is at most . Dividing by proves the positive-proxy bound. The probability event is for the squared fitted-value loss identified by [F10].
The centered vector proxy assumption is [F7], so [F2] applies to the identity subspace. If , for every integer , . Since , [F9] gives almost surely. Then ; the true support has zero residual, and step 1.1 shows that the selected support also has zero residual because . Its fitted vector therefore equals . Thus the bound also holds in the zero-proxy case.
Depends on
- Penalized support-search least squares
- $\lvert\mathcal{P}(A)\rvert = 2^{\lvert A\rvert}$ for finite $A$
- Finite tie-broken projection searches are Borel measurable
- Sub-Gaussian projection risk bounds
- A binomial support-count bound
- Sub-Gaussian variables and vectors, and sub-exponential variables
- The orthogonal projection is the unique nearest point in the subspace
- The real exponential function and the number $e$ by a power series
- The exponential function is strictly increasing
- The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for finite sums
- The orthogonal projection $P_Wv$ is the $W$-component in $V=W\oplus W^\perp$
- Basic identities for a probability measure
- Loss functions and risk
- The natural logarithm as the inverse of the exponential function
- Order, continuity, range, and the product, quotient, and reciprocal laws for the natural logarithm
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Penalized support-search least squares.
Dependency tree · two levels
91 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Philippe Rigollet and Jan-Christian Hütter, High-Dimensional Statistics: Lecture Notes, Chapter 2, Definition 2.12, Theorem 2.14 and full proof (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sylvain Arlot, Model/estimator selection, Lecture on model selection, §§2–3 (standard reference, not scraped)