How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the Borel sigma-algebra on R^n has cardinality continuum for n at least one
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For every with ,
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice and a natural number .
The rationals are countably infinite: ( is countably infinite).
Rational open boxes generate , and closed subsets of are Borel (For n at least one, open sets, closed sets, compact sets, open balls, boxes, rational open boxes, and rational half-open boxes generate the Borel sigma-algebra on R^n).
An infinite family of cardinality generates at most sets under the Axiom of Choice (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, an infinite family E generates at most |E|^aleph-zero sets).
Equinumerous sets have equinumerous power sets, and function spaces are transported by bijections (Disjoint union, cartesian product, function space and power set respect equinumerosity, and for ordinals the sets and carry explicit well-orders, so their cardinalities exist in ZF).
If each of two sets injects into the other, then they are equinumerous (The Schröder-Bernstein theorem).
Under the Axiom of Choice, (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, , and Cantor's theorem in cardinal form: ).
Under the Axiom of Choice every set can be well ordered, so the cardinalities needed here and the exponent are defined (The well-ordering theorem, Cardinal sum , product and exponentiation , and why they are written apart from the ordinal operations).
The product of the countably infinite cardinal with itself satisfies (Hessenberg: for every infinite cardinal , proved in ZF from the canonical well-order of ).
Proof
By [L1] and repeated use of the product identity in [L8], endpoint tuples show that the rational open boxes form an at most countable family. It is infinite because injects into that family when . Thus it is countably infinite, and [L2] and [L3] give .
Characteristic functions inject into . Conversely, the graph map injects into , which is equinumerous with by [L4] and [L8]. Hence [L5] and [L6] give .
For , let be the singleton when and the empty set otherwise. The point is defined because , each is closed and hence Borel by [L2], and is Borel. Distinct subsets give distinct unions, so injects into .
Steps 1.1 and 1.2 give an injection , while step 1.3 gives the reverse injection. Applying [L5] proves equality with .
Depends on
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, an infinite family E generates at most |E|^aleph-zero sets
- For n at least one, open sets, closed sets, compact sets, open balls, boxes, rational open boxes, and rational half-open boxes generate the Borel sigma-algebra on R^n
- $\mathbb{Q}$ is countably infinite
- Disjoint union, cartesian product, function space and power set respect equinumerosity, and for ordinals $\alpha, \beta$ the sets $\alpha \sqcup \beta$ and $\alpha \times \beta$ carry explicit well-orders, so their cardinalities exist in ZF
- The Schröder-Bernstein theorem
- The Axiom of Choice
- The well-ordering theorem
- Cardinal sum $\kappa \oplus \lambda$, product $\kappa \otimes \lambda$ and exponentiation $\kappa^{\lambda}$, and why they are written apart from the ordinal operations
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, $2^{\kappa} = \lvert \mathcal{P}(\kappa) \rvert$, and Cantor's theorem in cardinal form: $\kappa < 2^{\kappa}$
- Hessenberg: $\kappa \otimes \kappa = \kappa$ for every infinite cardinal $\kappa$, proved in ZF from the canonical well-order of $\kappa \times \kappa$
Used by
- FALSE: every subset of the real line is Borel False statement
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 157 results over 30 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Tao, An Introduction to Measure Theory, Exercise 1.4.16 (standard reference, not scraped)
- D. H. Fremlin, Measure Theory, Chapter 56, Section 561A and result 567E(b) (standard reference, not scraped)