How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elementary bounds on ideal cardinal invariants
Statement
In ZFC, for the Lebesgue-null ideal and for the meagre ideal of subsets of (Add, cov, non and cof for null and meagre ideals),
The two middle terms are not an assertion that and are comparable: and of the two cardinals are displayed, and is immediate. The content is the four inequalities , , , , the lower bound coming from countable closure, and the upper bound coming from Borel hulls.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: ZFC, hence the Axiom of Choice and the Axiom of Countable Choice.
For or the four numbers of Add, cov, non and cof for null and meagre ideals are cardinals, their defining minima are attained, every singleton is a member of both ideals, , a set is meagre exactly when it is contained in the union of a sequence of nowhere dense sets, and the two meagre conventions used in the library agree. (Add, cov, non and cof for null and meagre ideals, Nowhere dense, meagre, residual, and comeagre subsets of a topological space)
is a complete measure space, and in a complete measure space a countable union of measurable null sets is measurable and null. (Assuming countable choice, is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and is a complete measure extending elementary volume, Null sets are closed under countable unions and, in a complete space, under arbitrary subsets, Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure)
The meagre subsets of a topological space contain and are closed under taking subsets, and under the Axiom of Countable Choice they are closed under countable unions. (The meagre subsets of a topological space form a sigma-ideal)
Every has a set with and ; such a is Borel. (Every subset of has a measurable hull of the same outer measure)
; the Borel sigma-algebra contains the open sets and is closed under complements and countable unions, so it contains every closed set and every set. (Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the Borel sigma-algebra on R^n has cardinality continuum for n at least one, The continuum is equinumerous with the power set of the naturals, The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space, Sigma-algebras, and subsets of a topological space, agreeing with the real-line notion, Cardinal sum , product and exponentiation , and why they are written apart from the ordinal operations)
is the least cardinal strictly above ; the Axiom of Choice supplies a choice function for every family of nonempty sets, and under it every set has a cardinality. (The successor cardinal , the alephs , the beths , successor and limit cardinals, and the identifications and , The Axiom of Choice, A set equinumerous with some ordinal has a least such ordinal, that ordinal is a cardinal, and equinumerous sets get the same one; no choice principle is used, Cardinal (initial ordinal) and cardinality)
For the closure is the smallest closed superset of , and is closed exactly when ; a set is nowhere dense exactly when the interior of its closure is empty. (The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points, Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of , Nowhere dense, meagre, residual, and comeagre subsets of a topological space)
Proof
Finite unions. If with , then : extend the finite list to the sequence for , the empty set being in both ideals, and apply the countable-union clause of [F2] respectively [F3].
. If with , then gives , so is a candidate in the minimum defining the additivity and ; minimizing over covers of by members of gives .
. If with , then is the union of the family of members of , of cardinality ; this family is a candidate in the minimum defining the additivity, so , and minimizing over gives .
. Let be inclusion-cofinal in with (attained by [F1]). For each the singleton is a member of , so the set is nonempty, and the Axiom of Choice selects a member containing . Every real therefore lies in some member of , that is, , so is a cover of by members of and .
. Let again be inclusion-cofinal with . Since , no member equals , so each set is nonempty and the Axiom of Choice selects a point for every . Put ; then and because is the image of under . If were a member of , cofinality would give with , and then would contradict ; hence and .
. Let . By [F4] there is a set with and ; here because is measurable with , so , and is a Borel set, hence a member of , containing . Therefore the family consists of members of and is inclusion-cofinal in it, so by [F1] and [F5].
. Let and, by [F1], let be a sequence of nowhere dense sets with . Put . Each is closed by [F7], hence by [F7], so its interior is empty, that is, is nowhere dense; thus is the union of a sequence of nowhere dense sets and is meagre, and is , hence Borel and a member of , with . Therefore is inclusion-cofinal in , and .
Countable families never witness. If is at most countable, then : a finite family is handled by step 1.1, and a countably infinite family can be listed as a sequence and is handled by the countable-union clause of [F2] for and of [F3] for .
. By [F1] the minimum defining the additivity is attained, so there is with and . Step 2.1 shows that such an is not at most countable, so , and since is a cardinal and is the least cardinal strictly above , it follows that .
Combining step 3.1 with steps 1.2 and 1.3 gives ; steps 1.4 and 1.5 give ; steps 1.6 and 1.7 give for the two ideals; and of two cardinals is immediate. This is the displayed chain. ∎
Depends on
- Add, cov, non and cof for null and meagre ideals
- The meagre subsets of a topological space form a sigma-ideal
- Null sets are closed under countable unions and, in a complete space, under arbitrary subsets
- Assuming countable choice, $\mathcal{L}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ is a sigma-algebra containing every elementary set and $\lambda_n$ is a complete measure extending elementary volume
- Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure
- Every subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has a $G_\delta$ measurable hull of the same outer measure
- Assuming the Axiom of Choice, the Borel sigma-algebra on R^n has cardinality continuum for n at least one
- The continuum is equinumerous with the power set of the naturals
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
- Sigma-algebras
- The successor cardinal $\kappa^{+}$, the alephs $\aleph_\alpha$, the beths $\beth_\alpha$, successor and limit cardinals, and the identifications $\aleph_0 = \omega$ and $\aleph_1 = \omega_1$
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- A set equinumerous with some ordinal has a least such ordinal, that ordinal is a cardinal, and equinumerous sets get the same one; no choice principle is used
- Cardinal (initial ordinal) and cardinality
- Cardinal sum $\kappa \oplus \lambda$, product $\kappa \otimes \lambda$ and exponentiation $\kappa^{\lambda}$, and why they are written apart from the ordinal operations
- The closure equals the set together with its limit points, equals the set of points every neighbourhood of which meets it, and is the smallest closed superset; a set is closed iff it contains its limit points
- Interior, closure, boundary and exterior of a subset of $\mathbb{R}$
- Nowhere dense, meagre, residual, and comeagre subsets of a topological space
- $G_\delta$ and $F_\sigma$ subsets of a topological space, agreeing with the real-line notion
- Finite, countably infinite, countable, uncountable
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
104 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Tomek Bartoszynski, Invariants of Measure and Category, Section 2 (elementary properties of add, cov, non, cof), printed p.2 (standard reference, not scraped)