How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Cauchy–Pompeiu formula with fixed signs
Statement
Assume AC. Let be a bounded domain with boundary, let , and let . Orient by the outward-normal-first convention. Then
Equivalently, with ,
The singular area integrand is absolutely integrable near .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume AC; is bounded with boundary, is on , and .
AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).
The complex Stokes lemma explicitly assumes AC (Stokes for complex forms on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).
The one-variable Wirtinger derivative is (The Wirtinger derivatives and , and antiholomorphic functions).
The bigraded-form definition identifies the exterior derivative as the sum of its and components (Bigraded complex forms and the Dolbeault operators).
Under these hypotheses, the complex Stokes lemma gives (Stokes for complex forms on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).
Proof
For set and on its closure. Since is holomorphic there, [F3] gives . Writing and using , the repeated term vanishes, so . This is the needed type component of from [F4].
The continuous derivative is bounded on the compact . Near the absolute area density is at most , whose integral over is at most ; away from the integrand is bounded on the bounded domain. Thus the area term is absolutely integrable and its integral over the region defined in step 1.1 converges to that over as . Parametrizing the positively oriented circle by gives by continuity of .
The boundary of from step 1.1 is the disjoint union and the negatively oriented circle . The given full AC is the premise in [F1], so [F2] applies to on ; if is disconnected, each component has C¹ boundary and there are finitely many components because the compact C¹ boundary has a finite graph-chart cover, each chart meeting only one local interior component. Apply [F5] to the components and add. Using step 1.1 gives .
Letting in step 2.2 and using step 2.1 yields . Division by proves the first formula, with the plus sign fixed by the inner boundary orientation and the wedge swap in step 1.1.
Since , the area term in step 3.1 equals . This proves the equivalent area form.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lebl, Tasty Bits of Several Complex Variables, v4.4, Chapter 4 §4.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Jabbari, Notes for Analysis and Geometry of Several Complex Variables, §3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Guillemin and Campbell, MIT 18.117 Lecture Notes, Lectures 1–4 (standard reference, not scraped)