Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Cauchy–Pompeiu formula with fixed signs

Statement

Assume AC. Let D⊂C be a bounded domain with C1 boundary, let f∈C1(D‾), and let z∈D. Orient ∂D by the outward-normal-first convention. Then

f(z)=12πi∫∂Df(ζ)ζ−z dζ+12πi∫D∂ζˉf(ζ)ζ−z dζ∧dζˉ.

Equivalently, with dA=dx∧dy,

f(z)=12πi∫∂Df(ζ)ζ−z dζ−1π∫D∂ζˉf(ζ)ζ−z dA(ζ).

The singular area integrand is absolutely integrable near z.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume AC; D is bounded with C1 boundary, f is C1 on D‾, and z∈D.

[F1]

AC says every family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

The complex Stokes lemma explicitly assumes AC (Stokes for complex forms on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).

[F3]

The one-variable Wirtinger derivative is ∂ζˉf=12(∂xf+i ∂yf) (The Wirtinger derivatives ∂zf and ∂zˉf, and antiholomorphic functions).

[F4]

The bigraded-form definition identifies the exterior derivative as the sum of its ∂ and ∂ˉ components (Bigraded complex forms and the Dolbeault operators).

[F5]

Under these hypotheses, the complex Stokes lemma gives ∫∂Dα=∫Ddα (Stokes for complex forms on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F3F4givenalgebra

For 0<r<dist⁡(z,∂D) set Dr=D∖Br(z)‾ and g(ζ)=f(ζ)/(ζ−z) on its closure. Since 1/(ζ−z) is holomorphic there, [F3] gives ∂ζˉg=(∂ζˉf)/(ζ−z). Writing dg=(∂ζg)dζ+(∂ζˉg)dζˉ and using d(g dζ)=dg∧dζ, the repeated dζ term vanishes, so d(g dζ)=−(∂ζˉf)/(ζ−z) dζ∧dζˉ. This is the needed type component of d from [F4].

2.1F3givenstep 1.1algebra

The continuous derivative ∂ζˉf is bounded on the compact D‾. Near z the absolute area density is at most C∣ζ−z∣−1dA, whose integral over Bϵ(z) is at most 2πCϵ; away from z the integrand is bounded on the bounded domain. Thus the area term is absolutely integrable and its integral over the region Dr defined in step 1.1 converges to that over D as r↓0. Parametrizing the positively oriented circle by ζ=z+reit gives ∫∂Br(z)f(ζ)(ζ−z)−1dζ=i∫02πf(z+reit) dt→2πif(z) by continuity of f.

2.2F1F2F5step 1.1givenalgebra

The boundary of Dr from step 1.1 is the disjoint union ∂D and the negatively oriented circle −∂Br(z). The given full AC is the premise in [F1], so [F2] applies to g dζ on Dr; if Dr is disconnected, each component has C¹ boundary and there are finitely many components because the compact C¹ boundary has a finite graph-chart cover, each chart meeting only one local interior component. Apply [F5] to the components and add. Using step 1.1 gives ∫∂Df(ζ)(ζ−z)−1dζ−∫∂Br(z)f(ζ)(ζ−z)−1dζ=−∫Dr(∂ζˉf)(ζ−z)−1dζ∧dζˉ.

3.1step 2.2step 2.1step 1.1algebra

Letting r↓0 in step 2.2 and using step 2.1 yields ∫∂Df(ζ)(ζ−z)−1dζ+∫D(∂ζˉf)(ζ−z)−1dζ∧dζˉ=2πif(z). Division by 2πi proves the first formula, with the plus sign fixed by the inner boundary orientation and the wedge swap in step 1.1.

4.1step 3.1algebra∎

Since dζ∧dζˉ=(dx+i dy)∧(dx−i dy)=−2i dA, the area term in step 3.1 equals −π−1∫D(∂ζˉf)(ζ−z)−1dA. This proves the equivalent area form.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources