How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Dualization in a multitensor category is exact
Statement
For a multitensor category, the chosen left-dual functor is exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A multitensor category .
is an abelian rigid monoidal category (Tensor and multitensor categories).
Chosen left duals define a contravariant anti-monoidal functor (Left duality is a contravariant antimonoidal functor).
An equivalence between abelian categories is exact (An equivalence between abelian categories is exact).
Proof
Rigidity makes the contravariant functor of [L1] a duality: its quasi-inverse is the chosen right-dual functor. Thus it is an equivalence .
Both source and target are abelian, so [L2] makes this equivalence exact. Equivalently, a short exact sequence is carried, with arrows reversed, to a short exact sequence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik, Tensor Categories, Proposition 4.2.9 (standard reference, not scraped)