Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Under Dependent Choice, every nonempty Polish space is a continuous image of Baire sequence space

Statement

Assume Dependent Choice. Every nonempty Polish space is the image of a continuous surjection from Baire sequence space NN.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

The Baire sequence space is N:=NN, the set of functions from N to itself (def-the-set-of-functions-from-one-set-to-another), with the product topology obtained by giving each copy of N the discrete topology (def-product-topology, def-standard-topologies). For a finite sequence s=(s0,…,sk−1), its cylinder is Ns:={x∈N:xi=si for i<k}. The empty sequence has cylinder N, and these cylinders form a basis. (Baire sequence space NN and its cylinder topology).

[F2]

A topological space is Polish when it is separable (def-separable-space) and completely metrizable: its topology is induced by some complete metric (lem-complete-remetrisation). No particular compatible complete metric or countable dense subset is part of the structure. (Polish spaces are separable completely metrizable spaces).

[F3]

Let X be a set and let R⊆X×X be a binary relation on X. Call R entire on X when for every x∈X there is y∈X with xRy. The Axiom of Dependent Choice, written DC, is the following statement. The statement is: for every nonempty set X, every relation R entire on X, and every a∈X, there is a sequence x:N→X with x0=a and xnRxn+1 for every n∈N. (The axiom of dependent choice: a relation in which every element is related to something admits an N-indexed chain).

[F4]

Under Countable Choice for assertion 1, let (X,d) be a metric space (def-metric-space). Call a sequence (Fk)k∈N of subsets of X a Cantor chain if every Fk is nonempty, closed (def-metric-topology) and bounded, Fk+1⊆Fk for every k, and diam⁡(Fk)→0 in R (def-metric-bounded-diameter, def-real-limit). Then: 1. If (X,d) is complete (def-complete-metric-space), every Cantor chain in X has an intersection ⋂k∈NFk with exactly one element. 2. Conversely, if every Cantor chain in X has nonempty intersection, then (X,d) is complete. Boundedness of each Fk is part of the definition of a Cantor chain because diam⁡ is defined for nonempty bounded sets only in this library (def-metric-bounded-diameter); it is not an extra hypothesis but the precondition for writing the diameter condition down. (In a complete metric space nested nonempty closed sets whose diameters tend to 0 meet in exactly one point, and this property characterises completeness).

[F5]

Let (X,d) be a metric space (def-metric-space), let x∈X and let r∈R with r>0 (def-real-order). Define B(x,r):={ y∈X:d(x,y)<r },Bˉ(x,r):={ y∈X:d(x,y)≤r },S(x,r):={ y∈X:d(x,y)=r }. B(x,r) is the open ball, Bˉ(x,r) the closed ball and S(x,r) the sphere of centre x and radius r. The radius is always a strictly positive real; a ball of radius 0 or of negative radius is never written in this library. (Open ball, closed ball and sphere in a metric space).

[F6]

Dependent Choice implies Countable Choice directly: for a sequence (An)n∈N of nonempty sets, let S be the set of finite sequences s with s(i)∈Ai for i<length⁡(s). The empty sequence belongs to S. Relate s to each extension by one entry from Alength⁡(s); this relation is entire because that set is nonempty. Apply [F3] starting at the empty sequence. The resulting nested sequences have lengths 0,1,2,…, and their union is a function choosing an element of every An. No simultaneous choices were used to establish that the relation is entire.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF4F2F5

Choose a compatible complete metric and recursively refine each nonempty open set into a countable cover by open sets whose closures remain inside the parent and whose diameters tend to zero.

2.1step 1.1F1F2F3F4F6

An infinite branch determines one point by completeness. By [F3] and [F6], the Countable Choice hypothesis in [F4] holds, giving a continuous map from Baire space.

3.1step 2.1F3

For a prescribed target point, dependent choice selects a nested branch containing it, proving surjectivity.

4.1step 3.1F4

Nonemptiness is necessary because the domain is nonempty.

5.1step 4.1∎

The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

33 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources