How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A degree- polynomial has a splitting field spanned over by at most explicit root monomials
Statement
Let have degree . There is a splitting field , roots of in , and positive integers such that is spanned over by the root monomials and . Thus has a spanning family of at most explicit root monomials. When , , the sole empty monomial is , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field and a nonzero polynomial of degree .
Strong induction permits proving a statement at degree from all smaller degrees (Strong (complete) induction).
For , one may adjoin a root and write with (Kronecker's one-root step: adjoining a root removes a linear factor and lowers the remaining degree).
The minimal polynomial of divides every polynomial vanishing at (The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element).
If that minimal polynomial has degree , then has power basis (A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis and degree ).
The factorial satisfies and for (The factorial and the falling factorial , defined by recursion in ).
A splitting field is generated by the roots over the base field (Polynomials that split and splitting fields of a polynomial or a family of polynomials).
For nonzero polynomials over an integral domain, the degree of a product is the sum of the degrees (Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials).
Proof
Let be the full assertion in the Statement, quantified over all base fields. For , take and . The vector spans and the number of displayed empty monomials is .
Let and assume for every . By [F2], choose a root in the extension and write with . If the minimal polynomial of has degree , then , [F3] and [F7] give , and [F4] gives the -basis .
Apply the induction hypothesis over to . It gives a splitting field spanned over by at most monomials in roots of . Multiplying those monomials by spans over by monomials in roots of .
The number of resulting monomials is at most by and [F5]. Moreover , so it is a splitting field of .
The base case and inductive step establish for every natural by [F1].
Depends on
- Kronecker's one-root step: adjoining a root removes a linear factor and lowers the remaining degree
- The evaluation kernel and the unique monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element
- A simple algebraic extension is its minimal-polynomial quotient and has power basis $1,a,\ldots,a^{n-1}$ and degree $n$
- Over an integral domain, degrees add under multiplication of nonzero polynomials
- Strong (complete) induction
- The factorial $n!$ and the falling factorial $n^{\underline{k}}$, defined by recursion in $\mathbb{N}$
- Polynomials that split and splitting fields of a polynomial or a family of polynomials
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 93 results over 18 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- T. Judson, Abstract Algebra: Theory and Applications, Theorem 21.12 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory, Chapter 2 (standard reference, not scraped)