Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)audited 2026-10-08
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite-dimensionality of the cohomology of a divisor on a compact Riemann surface

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let X be a compact Riemann surface and D a divisor on X (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface). Put E=OX(D) and supply a Hermitian metric h on E and a compatible Riemannian metric g on X as in Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface. Write ∂ˉE for the smooth Dolbeault operator on E, and set Ω0,q(X,E)=C∞(X,Λ0,qT∗X⊗E) for q=0,1.

  1. The Dolbeault cohomology spaces H0,0(X,E)=ker⁡(∂ˉE:Ω0,0(X,E)→Ω0,1(X,E)),H0,1(X,E)=Ω0,1(X,E)/∂ˉEΩ0,0(X,E) are finite-dimensional. The first is H0(X,E)=Γ(X,E) and equals the harmonic space H0,0(E). Every class in the second has a unique harmonic representative in H0,1(E).

  2. The sheaf cohomology spaces H0(X,OX(D)) and H1(X,OX(D)) are finite-dimensional, and H0(X,OX(D))≅L(D). For every supplied finite good cover subordinate to holomorphic frame domains of E, the fixed-cover group Hˇ1(U,OX(E)) is also finite-dimensional. Define ℓ(D):=dim⁡H0(X,OX(D))=dim⁡L(D),i(D):=dim⁡H1(X,OX(D)),χ(OX(D)):=ℓ(D)−i(D). Then ℓ(D) and i(D) are nonnegative integers and χ(OX(D)) is an integer, which need not be nonnegative.

  3. If D′ is linearly equivalent to D, then ℓ(D′)=ℓ(D), i(D′)=i(D), and χ(OX(D′))=χ(OX(D)).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full AC, a compact Riemann surface X, a divisor D, the associated line bundle E=OX(D), and supplied compatible metrics g,h.

[F1]

Full AC is assumed by the Hodge finiteness theorem and by derived sheaf cohomology (The Axiom of Choice).

[F2]

Derived sheaf cohomology is functorial in a morphism of sheaves; an isomorphism of sheaves induces an isomorphism on every Hq (Sheaf cohomology as right derived global sections).

[F3]

Divisors D,D′ are linearly equivalent when D−D′ is principal (Divisors, principal divisors and canonical divisors on a Riemann surface).

[F4]

The holomorphic sections of OX(D) identify with L(D) by the canonical-section map (The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor).

[F5]

If (u)=D′−D, multiplication by 1/u induces the line-bundle isomorphism OX(D)≅OX(D′) (The holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor).

[F6]

The supplied compatible metrics define the smooth Dolbeault operator and harmonic spaces for the line bundle (Hermitian metric and L2 pairing on a compact Riemann surface).

[F7]

For a compact Riemann surface and a holomorphic Hermitian line bundle, the Dolbeault cohomology in bidegrees (0,0) and (0,1) is finite-dimensional and isomorphic to the corresponding harmonic space; each degree-one class has a unique harmonic representative (Dolbeault cohomology of a compact riemann surface is finite dimensional).

[F8]

The Dolbeault resolution identifies H0(X,OX(E)) with the holomorphic-section space and H1(X,OX(E)) with the smooth Dolbeault quotient (Cech--Dolbeault comparison for holomorphic line bundles on a compact Riemann surface).

[F9]

The canonical Leray map identifies fixed-cover Čech cohomology with sheaf cohomology for every supplied finite good cover subordinate to holomorphic frame domains (Cech--Dolbeault comparison for holomorphic line bundles on a compact Riemann surface).

Proof

The Hodge supplier in [F7] supplies the finite-dimensional harmonic representatives. The comparisons in [F8, F9] transport these conclusions to sheaf and fixed-cover Čech cohomology.

1.1F1F6F7given

For E=OX(D), the degree-zero Dolbeault cohomology is the kernel of ∂ˉE, hence the holomorphic-section space; it is finite-dimensional and equals H0,0(E) by [F7]. On a curve there are no (0,2)-forms, so every smooth (0,1)-form is ∂ˉE-closed and degree-one Dolbeault cohomology is exactly the displayed quotient. By [F7] this quotient is finite-dimensional and every class has exactly one harmonic representative.

2.1F1F4F8F9step 1.1given

The canonical comparison of [F8] identifies the degree-zero and degree-one Dolbeault groups with H0(X,OX(D)) and H1(X,OX(D)), respectively, so both sheaf-cohomology spaces are finite-dimensional. By [F9], Hˇ1(U,OX(E)) is isomorphic to H1(X,OX(E)) whenever a finite good cover subordinate to holomorphic frame domains is supplied. By [F4], H0(X,OX(D))≅L(D). Thus ℓ(D) and i(D) are finite nonnegative integers and their difference χ(OX(D)) is an integer; no nonnegativity of that difference is asserted.

3.1F1F2F3F5step 2.1algebra∎

Suppose D∼D′. By [F3] there is a nonzero meromorphic function u with (u)=D′−D. The isomorphism in [F5] identifies the sheaves of holomorphic sections of OX(D) and OX(D′), so [F2] induces an isomorphism on H1; on global sections the map is multiplication by 1/u. Thus both dimensions ℓ and i are unchanged, and their difference χ is unchanged as well.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

86 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources